Clinical Trust in Data-Driven Decision Support Tools: Qualitative Interview Study

Data-driven clinical decision support (CDSS) is increasingly available to healthcare practitioners (HCPs), yet little is known about their trust in such tools. Primary care and oncology practitioners were interviewed about their use of data-driven CDSS, understanding of development processes, and trustworthiness. Preliminary results show they find the tools useful for shared decision making with patients, but emphasise clinical judgement when interpreting recommendations. Understanding of development and evaluation is limited, but HCPs' wider expertise provides insight into key concepts. In future work, we will explore whether greater clinical involvement in CDSS development and evaluation enhances trustworthiness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in health technology and informatics
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3233/shti250361
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Trust in Data-Driven Decision Support Tools: Qualitative Interview Study

Ruth Evans, Louise Bryant, Kate Absolom, Gregor Russell
Studies in health technology and informatics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Clinical Trust in Data-Driven Decision Support Tools: Qualitative Interview Study

Ruth Evans, Louise Bryant, Kate Absolom, Gregor Russell
article en

Abstract

Data-driven clinical decision support (CDSS) is increasingly available to healthcare practitioners (HCPs), yet little is known about their trust in such tools. Primary care and oncology practitioners were interviewed about their use of data-driven CDSS, understanding of development processes, and trustworthiness. Preliminary results show they find the tools useful for shared decision making with patients, but emphasise clinical judgement when interpreting recommendations. Understanding of development and evaluation is limited, but HCPs' wider expertise provides insight into key concepts. In future work, we will explore whether greater clinical involvement in CDSS development and evaluation enhances trustworthiness.

Studies in health technology and informaticsVol. 327
University of Leeds (GB), Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.