A Customizable Data Quality Tool for Global Observational Research Networks

Evaluating data quality is essential when combining multi-site observational clinical data for analysis. We collaborated with five research networks, representing various data approaches and workflows, to generalize an established data quality checking and report generation tool so it could be implemented more easily by other research consortia. The resulting approach reduced the need for technical expertise at user sites by leveraging the REDCap data collection software to store details about a research group, their data model, and expectations about variables (e.g., plausible numeric range, valid format and codes, date logic). The application then used the REDCap API to retrieve those details and assess a dataset's conformance to the data model, logical consistency, and completeness. Users could download reports that summarized the dataset contents and quality. The generalized Harmonist Data Toolkit was built using the freely available REDCap and R/Shiny platforms, with code available on GitHub. All five collaborating consortia found the Toolkit beneficial in detecting inconsistencies and providing informative data reports and visualizations. The Harmonist Data Toolkit fills a need for data quality and report generation solutions for consortia without local programming expertise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in health technology and informatics
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3233/shti250391
Primary Topic
Data Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Customizable Data Quality Tool for Global Observational Research Networks

Megan Turner, Kalongo Hamusonde, Judith Lewis, Fernanda Maruri et al.
Studies in health technology and informatics
Data Quality and Management
article

A Customizable Data Quality Tool for Global Observational Research Networks

Megan Turner, Kalongo Hamusonde, Judith Lewis, Fernanda Maruri, Keri N. Althoff, Awachana Jiamsakul, Charles W. Goss, Dhanushi Rupasinghe, Mansi Agarwal, Stephany N. Duda, Austin Katona, Brenna Hogan, Savannah Obregon
article en

Abstract

Evaluating data quality is essential when combining multi-site observational clinical data for analysis. We collaborated with five research networks, representing various data approaches and workflows, to generalize an established data quality checking and report generation tool so it could be implemented more easily by other research consortia. The resulting approach reduced the need for technical expertise at user sites by leveraging the REDCap data collection software to store details about a research group, their data model, and expectations about variables (e.g., plausible numeric range, valid format and codes, date logic). The application then used the REDCap API to retrieve those details and assess a dataset's conformance to the data model, logical consistency, and completeness. Users could download reports that summarized the dataset contents and quality. The generalized Harmonist Data Toolkit was built using the freely available REDCap and R/Shiny platforms, with code available on GitHub. All five collaborating consortia found the Toolkit beneficial in detecting inconsistencies and providing informative data reports and visualizations. The Harmonist Data Toolkit fills a need for data quality and report generation solutions for consortia without local programming expertise.

Studies in health technology and informaticsVol. 327
Johns Hopkins University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University Hospital of Bern (CH), UNSW Sydney (AU), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
European Association for the Study of the Liver, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Data Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.