Initial Evaluation of ICD-11’s Adherence to Acceptable Terminology Practices

This research evaluates ICD-11 using the cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG®) Terminology Review Criteria Matrix version 3.3 and the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) criteria for adoption and implementation and guidelines for curation and dissemination of health terminology and vocabulary standards. The aim is to determine if ICD-11 meets acceptable terminology practices and to identify its strengths and weaknesses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in health technology and informatics
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3233/shti250645
Primary Topic
Medical Coding and Health Information
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Initial Evaluation of ICD-11’s Adherence to Acceptable Terminology Practices

Mary H Stanfill, Susan H. Fenton, Kathy Giannangelo
Studies in health technology and informatics
Medical Coding and Health Information
article

Initial Evaluation of ICD-11’s Adherence to Acceptable Terminology Practices

Mary H Stanfill, Susan H. Fenton, Kathy Giannangelo
article en

Abstract

This research evaluates ICD-11 using the cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG®) Terminology Review Criteria Matrix version 3.3 and the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) criteria for adoption and implementation and guidelines for curation and dissemination of health terminology and vocabulary standards. The aim is to determine if ICD-11 meets acceptable terminology practices and to identify its strengths and weaknesses.

Studies in health technology and informaticsVol. 327
Link Consulting (PT), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Medical Coding and Health Information
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.