German Medical NER with BERT and LLMs: The Impact of Training Data Size

Named Entity Recognition (NER) in the medical domain often presents significant challenges due to the complexity and specificity of medical terminology, especially in lower-resource settings where annotated data is scarce. This study explores the performance of an exemplary large language model and a BERT-based model in the context of NER for German medical texts. We focus on the impact of different data sizes for training and their performance to simulate lower-resource conditions. Both models are evaluated on two German annotated corpora. Our results reveal that both models perform rather similar on both datasets, with LLaMA3.1 performing slightly better with less training material.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in health technology and informatics
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3233/shti250469
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

German Medical NER with BERT and LLMs: The Impact of Training Data Size

Szu‐Yuan Wu, Raphael Scheible, Luise Modersohn, Martin Boeker et al.
Studies in health technology and informatics
Topic Modeling
article

German Medical NER with BERT and LLMs: The Impact of Training Data Size

Szu‐Yuan Wu, Raphael Scheible, Luise Modersohn, Martin Boeker, Claudio Benzoni, Justin Hofenbitzer, Peter Pallaoro, Suteera Seeha
article en

Abstract

Named Entity Recognition (NER) in the medical domain often presents significant challenges due to the complexity and specificity of medical terminology, especially in lower-resource settings where annotated data is scarce. This study explores the performance of an exemplary large language model and a BERT-based model in the context of NER for German medical texts. We focus on the impact of different data sizes for training and their performance to simulate lower-resource conditions. Both models are evaluated on two German annotated corpora. Our results reveal that both models perform rather similar on both datasets, with LLaMA3.1 performing slightly better with less training material.

Studies in health technology and informaticsVol. 327
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.