Bigger Isn’t Always Better: Data Considerations for Latent Class Analysis

Increasingly large datasets of clinical information present a significant opportunity to stratify patients for a more personalised approach to care. However, these data can be sparse and noisy, requiring processing of this data to be carefully considered. Here, we apply different minimum prevalence thresholds to diagnosis codes in a cohort of Multiple Sclerosis patients. We use this data to stratify patients using latent class analysis and examine the effect of different prevalence thresholds on the classes generated. We also examine computation efficiency using several disease-specific datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in health technology and informatics
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3233/shti250377
Primary Topic
Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bigger Isn’t Always Better: Data Considerations for Latent Class Analysis

Nophar Geifman, Imogen S. Stafford
1 links
Studies in health technology and informatics
Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
article

Bigger Isn’t Always Better: Data Considerations for Latent Class Analysis

Nophar Geifman, Imogen S. Stafford
article en

Abstract

Increasingly large datasets of clinical information present a significant opportunity to stratify patients for a more personalised approach to care. However, these data can be sparse and noisy, requiring processing of this data to be carefully considered. Here, we apply different minimum prevalence thresholds to diagnosis codes in a cohort of Multiple Sclerosis patients. We use this data to stratify patients using latent class analysis and examine the effect of different prevalence thresholds on the classes generated. We also examine computation efficiency using several disease-specific datasets.

Studies in health technology and informaticsVol. 327
University of Surrey (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.