Exploring Differential Diagnosis-Based Explainable AI: A Case Study in Melanoma Detection

Melanoma is a significant global health concern, with rising incidence rates and high mortality when diagnosed late. Artificial Intelligence (AI) models, especially models using deep learning techniques, have shown promising results in melanoma detection. However, the complexity of these models often leads to a lack of transparency, making it difficult for clinicians to understand and trust AI-based diagnoses. This paper presents a novel Explainable AI (XAI) method that aligns with differential diagnosis techniques commonly used in clinical settings, providing more comprehensive explanations. The novel XAI method and four commonly used XAI methods were evaluated with intended users with respect to perceived useability and trust. We found that the new method was considered more useful than other methods tested. Notably, the widely used saliency mapping technique received the lowest ratings, performing even worse than providing no explanation at all.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in health technology and informatics
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3233/shti250389
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Differential Diagnosis-Based Explainable AI: A Case Study in Melanoma Detection

Danielle Sent, Bjorn Buijing
Studies in health technology and informatics
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

Exploring Differential Diagnosis-Based Explainable AI: A Case Study in Melanoma Detection

Danielle Sent, Bjorn Buijing
article en

Abstract

Melanoma is a significant global health concern, with rising incidence rates and high mortality when diagnosed late. Artificial Intelligence (AI) models, especially models using deep learning techniques, have shown promising results in melanoma detection. However, the complexity of these models often leads to a lack of transparency, making it difficult for clinicians to understand and trust AI-based diagnoses. This paper presents a novel Explainable AI (XAI) method that aligns with differential diagnosis techniques commonly used in clinical settings, providing more comprehensive explanations. The novel XAI method and four commonly used XAI methods were evaluated with intended users with respect to perceived useability and trust. We found that the new method was considered more useful than other methods tested. Notably, the widely used saliency mapping technique received the lowest ratings, performing even worse than providing no explanation at all.

Studies in health technology and informaticsVol. 327
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Tilburg University (NL), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.