Detecting the Potential for Bias in Healthcare Data

Bias in healthcare, including systematic errors, prejudice, or assumptions involving patient care, is an important issue which can cause disparities in health outcomes. In this review we focus on information bias, specifically measurement bias. This bias includes systematic errors in collecting, recording, or interpreting healthcare data, hence the crucial role of healthcare professionals, researchers, and policymakers. Measurement bias becomes an issue when sensitive attributes are involved, as these biases can impact public health decisions based on inaccurate data. We used a cross-checking validation process to address these concerns and enhance data quality. We compared patient data from two different sources, from UAMS and a commercial data provider, both relating to the same healthcare event, to verify accuracy and Consistency. Our analysis incorporated essential data quality metrics to ensure the reliability of the findings. These metrics include Completeness, Accuracy, Consistency, and Validity. Cross-checking with these data quality metrics allowed us to detect discrepancies and inconsistencies, as well as the overall reliability and validity of the data. Our study highlights the importance of rigorous validation and data quality measures to minimize bias and ensure accurate, reliable conclusions, and it calls for the active participation of the audience in this endeavor.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in health technology and informatics
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3233/shti250582
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
22.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting the Potential for Bias in Healthcare Data

Melody Greer, Emel Seker
1 citations
Studies in health technology and informatics
Healthcare Policy and Management
22.01
article

Detecting the Potential for Bias in Healthcare Data

Melody Greer, Emel Seker
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Bias in healthcare, including systematic errors, prejudice, or assumptions involving patient care, is an important issue which can cause disparities in health outcomes. In this review we focus on information bias, specifically measurement bias. This bias includes systematic errors in collecting, recording, or interpreting healthcare data, hence the crucial role of healthcare professionals, researchers, and policymakers. Measurement bias becomes an issue when sensitive attributes are involved, as these biases can impact public health decisions based on inaccurate data. We used a cross-checking validation process to address these concerns and enhance data quality. We compared patient data from two different sources, from UAMS and a commercial data provider, both relating to the same healthcare event, to verify accuracy and Consistency. Our analysis incorporated essential data quality metrics to ensure the reliability of the findings. These metrics include Completeness, Accuracy, Consistency, and Validity. Cross-checking with these data quality metrics allowed us to detect discrepancies and inconsistencies, as well as the overall reliability and validity of the data. Our study highlights the importance of rigorous validation and data quality measures to minimize bias and ensure accurate, reliable conclusions, and it calls for the active participation of the audience in this endeavor.

Studies in health technology and informaticsVol. 327
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Healthcare Policy and Management
22.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.