Evaluating the success of community engagement in the Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control Equity

Community-engaged research is essential to advance the implementation of evidence-based practices, but engagement quality is rarely assessed. We evaluated community health centers' (CHCs) experiences partnering with the Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control Equity (ISCCCE) using an online survey of 59 CHC staff. Of 38 respondents (64.4% response rate), most perceived their engagement positively, with over 92% feeling respected by ISCCCE collaborators and perceiving projects as beneficial. Limited staff time and resources were the main challenges identified. This study suggests the utility of gathering feedback to evaluate community research engagement and inform adaptations of research processes to optimize partnership quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.86
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the success of community engagement in the Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control Equity

Karen M. Emmons, Melissa Holguin, Lydia E. Pace, Susan Dargon-Hart et al.
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Evaluating the success of community engagement in the Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control Equity

Karen M. Emmons, Melissa Holguin, Lydia E. Pace, Susan Dargon-Hart, Gina Kruse, Madeline E. Davies, Rebekka M. Lee, Leslie Pelton-Cairns, Stephanie Martinez, James G. Daly, Leslie Salas Karnes
article en

Abstract

Community-engaged research is essential to advance the implementation of evidence-based practices, but engagement quality is rarely assessed. We evaluated community health centers' (CHCs) experiences partnering with the Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control Equity (ISCCCE) using an online survey of 59 CHC staff. Of 38 respondents (64.4% response rate), most perceived their engagement positively, with over 92% feeling respected by ISCCCE collaborators and perceiving projects as beneficial. Limited staff time and resources were the main challenges identified. This study suggests the utility of gathering feedback to evaluate community research engagement and inform adaptations of research processes to optimize partnership quality.

Journal of Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 9(1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Association of Community Cancer Centers (US), Community Health Center (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
University of Cambridge
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.