Improving the Usability of a Digital Questionnaire to Elicit Symptoms for Patients Referred via the Cancer Diagnostic Pathway for Suspected Head and Neck Cancer

We present the usability testing of a digital questionnaire co-designed with patient representatives. Two usability methods, think-aloud and timed usability testing, were employed to assess the system. Twelve participants took part in the study by completing the questionnaire, reporting HNC symptoms. Think-aloud testing revealed issues such as unclear instructions and layout inconsistencies, while timed usability testing indicated that younger participants (16-54 years) completed the tasks faster than older participants (55-74 years), although the difference was not significant. The System Usability Scale (SUS) scores reflected overall positive feedback, with suggestions for further improvements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in health technology and informatics
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3233/shti250564
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving the Usability of a Digital Questionnaire to Elicit Symptoms for Patients Referred via the Cancer Diagnostic Pathway for Suspected Head and Neck Cancer

John Hardman, Nikki Rousseau, Chinasa Odo, Lynn McVey et al.
4 links
Studies in health technology and informatics
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Improving the Usability of a Digital Questionnaire to Elicit Symptoms for Patients Referred via the Cancer Diagnostic Pathway for Suspected Head and Neck Cancer

John Hardman, Nikki Rousseau, Chinasa Odo, Lynn McVey, Vinidh Paleri, Rebecca Randell, Joanne M. Patterson
article en

Abstract

We present the usability testing of a digital questionnaire co-designed with patient representatives. Two usability methods, think-aloud and timed usability testing, were employed to assess the system. Twelve participants took part in the study by completing the questionnaire, reporting HNC symptoms. Think-aloud testing revealed issues such as unclear instructions and layout inconsistencies, while timed usability testing indicated that younger participants (16-54 years) completed the tasks faster than older participants (55-74 years), although the difference was not significant. The System Usability Scale (SUS) scores reflected overall positive feedback, with suggestions for further improvements.

Studies in health technology and informaticsVol. 327
University of Leeds (GB), Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Bradford (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), Northwick Park Hospital (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Programme Grants for Applied Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Improving the Usability of a Digital Questionnaire to Elicit Symptoms for Patients Referred via the Cancer Diagnostic Pathway for Suspected Head and Neck Cancer — John Hardman, Nikki Rousseau, et al. · Studies in health technology and informatics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS