Risk Stratification Using a Novel Polypharmacy Assessment Score

Polypharmacy is a global health priority, characterized by an escalating prevalence of people using multiple medicines. Identifying people with problematic polypharmacy is complex, as multiple medicines can be suitable for people with several chronic conditions requiring more treatment. We present the development and internal validation of a novel approach to identifying potentially problematic polypharmacy. Medication count was modelled using zero-inflated negative binomial regression with age, gender, 37 long-term conditions and their grouped interactions as dependent variables. The "Polypharmacy Assessment Score" was then constructed through calculating the difference between the observed and modelled count of prescribed medications, thereby highlighting groups with unexpected levels of prescribing. This exhibited superior predictive validity for several clinical outcomes, compared with current approaches of using simple counts. Next steps to advance clinical utility include assessment for bias in certain groups and optimizing risk stratification groups to benefit patient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in health technology and informatics
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3233/shti250586
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Stratification Using a Novel Polypharmacy Assessment Score

Darren Mark Ashcroft, Matthew Sperrin, Rupert Payne, Thomas Blakeman et al.
Studies in health technology and informatics
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Risk Stratification Using a Novel Polypharmacy Assessment Score

Darren Mark Ashcroft, Matthew Sperrin, Rupert Payne, Thomas Blakeman, Jung Yin Tsang
article en

Abstract

Polypharmacy is a global health priority, characterized by an escalating prevalence of people using multiple medicines. Identifying people with problematic polypharmacy is complex, as multiple medicines can be suitable for people with several chronic conditions requiring more treatment. We present the development and internal validation of a novel approach to identifying potentially problematic polypharmacy. Medication count was modelled using zero-inflated negative binomial regression with age, gender, 37 long-term conditions and their grouped interactions as dependent variables. The "Polypharmacy Assessment Score" was then constructed through calculating the difference between the observed and modelled count of prescribed medications, thereby highlighting groups with unexpected levels of prescribing. This exhibited superior predictive validity for several clinical outcomes, compared with current approaches of using simple counts. Next steps to advance clinical utility include assessment for bias in certain groups and optimizing risk stratification groups to benefit patient care.

Studies in health technology and informaticsVol. 327
University of Exeter (GB), University of Manchester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Risk Stratification Using a Novel Polypharmacy Assessment Score — Darren Mark Ashcroft, Matthew Sperrin, et al. · Studies in health technology and informatics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS