A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of LLM-Based Chatbots for Menopause

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into healthcare settings has gained significant attention, particularly for question-answering tasks. Given the high-stakes nature of healthcare, it is essential to ensure that LLM-generated content is accurate and reliable to prevent adverse outcomes. However, the development of robust evaluation metrics and methodologies remains a matter of much debate. We examine the performance of publicly available LLM-based chatbots for menopause-related queries, using a mixed-methods approach to evaluate safety, consensus, objectivity, reproducibility, and explainability. Our findings highlight the promise and limitations of traditional evaluation metrics for sensitive health topics. We propose the need for customized and ethically grounded evaluation frameworks to assess LLMs to advance safe and effective use in healthcare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in health technology and informatics
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3233/shti250575
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of LLM-Based Chatbots for Menopause

Nadi Kaonga, Selen Bozkurt, Azra Ismail, E. Britton Chahine et al.
1 citations
Studies in health technology and informatics
Topic Modeling
4.74
article

A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of LLM-Based Chatbots for Menopause

Nadi Kaonga, Selen Bozkurt, Azra Ismail, E. Britton Chahine, Roshini Deva, Agena Davenport-Nicholson, S Manvi, Jasmine Zhou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into healthcare settings has gained significant attention, particularly for question-answering tasks. Given the high-stakes nature of healthcare, it is essential to ensure that LLM-generated content is accurate and reliable to prevent adverse outcomes. However, the development of robust evaluation metrics and methodologies remains a matter of much debate. We examine the performance of publicly available LLM-based chatbots for menopause-related queries, using a mixed-methods approach to evaluate safety, consensus, objectivity, reproducibility, and explainability. Our findings highlight the promise and limitations of traditional evaluation metrics for sensitive health topics. We propose the need for customized and ethically grounded evaluation frameworks to assess LLMs to advance safe and effective use in healthcare.

Studies in health technology and informaticsVol. 327
Emory University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Topic Modeling
4.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of LLM-Based Chatbots for Menopause — Nadi Kaonga, Selen Bozkurt, et al. · Studies in health technology and informatics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS