30 years of the Advisory Opinion on the Legality of Nuclear Weapons: eppur si muove

Abstract The 1996 Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons remains a pivotal reference in international law and disarmament debates. While the Opinion did not categorically prohibit nuclear weapons, its reasoning has been widely cited in legal and diplomatic arenas. This study examines the Opinion’s long-term influence through three key elements: its incorporation into state practice, its role in international litigation, and its impact on the 2017 Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. Employing a methodology centered on primary sources, this research evaluates the Opinion’s relevance in shaping international legal norms and assesses whether it still accurately reflects the state of international law on nuclear disarmament.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202500104
Primary Topic
Nuclear Issues and Defense
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

30 years of the Advisory Opinion on the Legality of Nuclear Weapons: eppur si muove

Lucas Carlos Lima
Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional
Nuclear Issues and Defense
article

30 years of the Advisory Opinion on the Legality of Nuclear Weapons: eppur si muove

Lucas Carlos Lima
article en

Abstract

Abstract The 1996 Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons remains a pivotal reference in international law and disarmament debates. While the Opinion did not categorically prohibit nuclear weapons, its reasoning has been widely cited in legal and diplomatic arenas. This study examines the Opinion’s long-term influence through three key elements: its incorporation into state practice, its role in international litigation, and its impact on the 2017 Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. Employing a methodology centered on primary sources, this research evaluates the Opinion’s relevance in shaping international legal norms and assesses whether it still accurately reflects the state of international law on nuclear disarmament.

Revista Brasileira de Política InternacionalVol. 68(1)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
University of Oxford, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Nuclear Issues and Defense
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

30 years of the Advisory Opinion on the Legality of Nuclear Weapons: eppur si muove — Lucas Carlos Lima · Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS