Dimensional accuracy and resolution assessment of the formlabs form 3B 3D printer for medical applications

• Design of a phantom to assess accuracy and resolution of a Formlabs 3D printer • The phantom includes specific features common for surgical guides • The dimensional accuracy is dependent on the printing orientation • The dimensional accuracy varies between -0.2mm and 0.4mm • A reference for the printing accuracy for a medical grade resin is provided For quality management of in-hospital 3D printing, it is essential to have detailed knowledge on the accuracy and reproducibility of the 3D printing process. In this study, the influence of several printing and post-processing parameters on dimensional accuracy and resolution were evaluated in three different hospitals to provide a reference for printer performance for medical applications. A custom phantom was designed comprising features to assess accuracy and resolution of the Form 3B printer (Formlabs, Somerville, MA, USA). Specific features common for surgical guides were included, such as slits, flanges, and cylinders. The phantoms were 3D printed using a medical grade resin (Formlabs Biomed Clear resin) and evaluated after postprocessing and sterilization. Dimensional accuracy was defined as the deviation between the actual measurement and the known feature dimension and evaluated in x-, y- and z-direction. Resolution was defined as the smallest complete feature. The accuracy of the prints in the x-direction varied between -0.1mm and 0.1mm, in the y-direction between -0.25mm and 0.4mm and in the z-direction between -0.2mm and 0.4mm. The influence of sterilization on the accuracy was negligible. The smallest slit that was always open when printing in the x-direction was 0.3mm and in the y-direction 0.4mm. This study provides hospitals with a reference for the printing accuracy and resolution for a medical grade resin. The phantom designed can be used in every hospital to determine their own printing accuracy and tolerances thereby optimizing product design for the intended clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of 3D Printed Medicine
Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stlm.2025.100204
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dimensional accuracy and resolution assessment of the formlabs form 3B 3D printer for medical applications

Jennifer Dekker, Maaike A. Koenrades, Shane Bergsma, Vera Lagerburg et al.
Annals of 3D Printed Medicine
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Dimensional accuracy and resolution assessment of the formlabs form 3B 3D printer for medical applications

Jennifer Dekker, Maaike A. Koenrades, Shane Bergsma, Vera Lagerburg, Judith Waldner-Troost, Wouter Diemer, A.C.T. Vrancken
article en

Abstract

• Design of a phantom to assess accuracy and resolution of a Formlabs 3D printer • The phantom includes specific features common for surgical guides • The dimensional accuracy is dependent on the printing orientation • The dimensional accuracy varies between -0.2mm and 0.4mm • A reference for the printing accuracy for a medical grade resin is provided For quality management of in-hospital 3D printing, it is essential to have detailed knowledge on the accuracy and reproducibility of the 3D printing process. In this study, the influence of several printing and post-processing parameters on dimensional accuracy and resolution were evaluated in three different hospitals to provide a reference for printer performance for medical applications. A custom phantom was designed comprising features to assess accuracy and resolution of the Form 3B printer (Formlabs, Somerville, MA, USA). Specific features common for surgical guides were included, such as slits, flanges, and cylinders. The phantoms were 3D printed using a medical grade resin (Formlabs Biomed Clear resin) and evaluated after postprocessing and sterilization. Dimensional accuracy was defined as the deviation between the actual measurement and the known feature dimension and evaluated in x-, y- and z-direction. Resolution was defined as the smallest complete feature. The accuracy of the prints in the x-direction varied between -0.1mm and 0.1mm, in the y-direction between -0.25mm and 0.4mm and in the z-direction between -0.2mm and 0.4mm. The influence of sterilization on the accuracy was negligible. The smallest slit that was always open when printing in the x-direction was 0.3mm and in the y-direction 0.4mm. This study provides hospitals with a reference for the printing accuracy and resolution for a medical grade resin. The phantom designed can be used in every hospital to determine their own printing accuracy and tolerances thereby optimizing product design for the intended clinical application.

Annals of 3D Printed MedicineVol. 19
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Catharina Ziekenhuis (NL), Medisch Spectrum Twente (NL), Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL), GGD Amsterdam (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.