Acute Percussive Massage Device Use Does Not Improve Anaerobic Performance

This study investigated the effects of acute percussive massage (PM) on anaerobic performance. Twenty-nine collegiate athletes (16 men, 13 women) between the ages of 18 and 22 participated in this study. Participants were randomly assigned to either the PM group (PMG) or a resting control group (CG). All subjects completed three Wingate Anaerobic tests (WAnT) against 8% of their body mass, with each test separated by 3 minutes of rest. During the 3 minutes of rest, the intervention group had PM applied to the quadriceps and hamstrings on each leg for 30 seconds each while the CG rested passively for the full three-minute period, lying supine and prone for 1 minute each, mimicking the body position during the rest period in the PMG. For both groups, there was a significant main effect for time over the three WAnTs on peak power (F(2,50) = 36.69, p < 0.01, η2 = .595) mean power (F(2,48) = 147.85, p < 0.01, η2 = .860), and fatigue index (F(2,48) = 9.464, p < 0.01, η2 = .283). No group differences were observed between the PMG and CG (p > 0.05). These findings show that acute PM does not improve anaerobic performance or delay fatigue more than passive rest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Strength and Conditioning
Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v5i1.373
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acute Percussive Massage Device Use Does Not Improve Anaerobic Performance

Bradley J. Kendall, Brandon Dykstra, Emma Clarke
International Journal of Strength and Conditioning
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Acute Percussive Massage Device Use Does Not Improve Anaerobic Performance

Bradley J. Kendall, Brandon Dykstra, Emma Clarke
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of acute percussive massage (PM) on anaerobic performance. Twenty-nine collegiate athletes (16 men, 13 women) between the ages of 18 and 22 participated in this study. Participants were randomly assigned to either the PM group (PMG) or a resting control group (CG). All subjects completed three Wingate Anaerobic tests (WAnT) against 8% of their body mass, with each test separated by 3 minutes of rest. During the 3 minutes of rest, the intervention group had PM applied to the quadriceps and hamstrings on each leg for 30 seconds each while the CG rested passively for the full three-minute period, lying supine and prone for 1 minute each, mimicking the body position during the rest period in the PMG. For both groups, there was a significant main effect for time over the three WAnTs on peak power (F(2,50) = 36.69, p < 0.01, η2 = .595) mean power (F(2,48) = 147.85, p < 0.01, η2 = .860), and fatigue index (F(2,48) = 9.464, p < 0.01, η2 = .283). No group differences were observed between the PMG and CG (p > 0.05). These findings show that acute PM does not improve anaerobic performance or delay fatigue more than passive rest.

International Journal of Strength and ConditioningVol. 5(1)
Taylor University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.