Keputusan Kepala Daerah Tentang Penetapan Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Sebagai Desa

Introduction: The institutionalization of the Customary Law Community (MHA) unit into a Customary Village is carried out through a determination carried out by the Regional Head. Related to the determination as a unit of MHA as a Customary Village. Provisions regarding the requirements and implementation of the determination of the MHA unit to become a Customary Village are regulated in the provisions of Law No. 6 of 2014 Article 97. The implementation of the determination of the MHA unit as a Customary Village in reality, there are those that are not designated as Customary Villages, but as Villages, even though the requirements and criteria in the provisions of Law No. 6 of 2014 have been met. The determination of MHA units in West Seram Regency as a Village and not as a Customary Village raises legal problems. Juridically, normatively, the MHA units meet all the requirements and criteria of Law No. 6 of 2014 article 97, but are not designated as Customary Villages (or in SBB Regency term referred to as state) but as Villages.Purposes of the Research: The aim of this research is Validity of the Decision of the Regional Head Regarding the Determination of the Unity of the Customary Law Community as a Village Based on Law Number 6 of 2014Methods of the Research: The research used by the author is an empirical juridical research type. The procedure for collecting legal materials by conducting research in the form of interviews and observations as well as literature studies on legal materials, namely primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Then the legal materials that have been obtained are analyzed descriptively-qualitatively.Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The results obtained are the importance of determining the unity of the customary law community into a village must pay attention to various things in order to realize the welfare of the people which does not contradict the correct legal mechanism so that it does not have fatal legal consequences and is detrimental to the community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SANISA Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47268/sanisa.v5i1.3024
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Keputusan Kepala Daerah Tentang Penetapan Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Sebagai Desa

Ryan Kevin Nahumury, Renny Heronia Nendissa, Benjamin Carel Picauly
SANISA Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Keputusan Kepala Daerah Tentang Penetapan Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Sebagai Desa

Ryan Kevin Nahumury, Renny Heronia Nendissa, Benjamin Carel Picauly
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The institutionalization of the Customary Law Community (MHA) unit into a Customary Village is carried out through a determination carried out by the Regional Head. Related to the determination as a unit of MHA as a Customary Village. Provisions regarding the requirements and implementation of the determination of the MHA unit to become a Customary Village are regulated in the provisions of Law No. 6 of 2014 Article 97. The implementation of the determination of the MHA unit as a Customary Village in reality, there are those that are not designated as Customary Villages, but as Villages, even though the requirements and criteria in the provisions of Law No. 6 of 2014 have been met. The determination of MHA units in West Seram Regency as a Village and not as a Customary Village raises legal problems. Juridically, normatively, the MHA units meet all the requirements and criteria of Law No. 6 of 2014 article 97, but are not designated as Customary Villages (or in SBB Regency term referred to as state) but as Villages.Purposes of the Research: The aim of this research is Validity of the Decision of the Regional Head Regarding the Determination of the Unity of the Customary Law Community as a Village Based on Law Number 6 of 2014Methods of the Research: The research used by the author is an empirical juridical research type. The procedure for collecting legal materials by conducting research in the form of interviews and observations as well as literature studies on legal materials, namely primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Then the legal materials that have been obtained are analyzed descriptively-qualitatively.Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The results obtained are the importance of determining the unity of the customary law community into a village must pay attention to various things in order to realize the welfare of the people which does not contradict the correct legal mechanism so that it does not have fatal legal consequences and is detrimental to the community.

SANISA Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa HukumVol. 5(1)
University of Pattimura (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.