Fault Detection and Classification in Electrical Power Distribution Network Through Machine Learning

This article used Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), Extra Trees (ET), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) for fault detection and classification in electrical power distribution network. The study covers the detection and classification of different fault conditions like line to ground fault, double line fault, double to ground fault and three phase faults along with normal condition (no fault). The experimental results demonstrated that ensemble methods, particularly RF, XGBoost, and ET, significantly outperformed the individual models, achieving high accuracy rates exceeding 99%. The ET model emerged as the best performer, showcasing exceptional precision, recall, and F1-scores, with very few misclassifications as evidenced by the confusion matrices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/inmic64792.2024.11004313
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electricity Theft Detection Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fault Detection and Classification in Electrical Power Distribution Network Through Machine Learning

Rana E. Ahmed, Ziad M. Ali, Muhammad Amir Raza, Muhammad Azan et al.
1 citations
Electricity Theft Detection Techniques
0.21
article

Fault Detection and Classification in Electrical Power Distribution Network Through Machine Learning

Rana E. Ahmed, Ziad M. Ali, Muhammad Amir Raza, Muhammad Azan, Hizbullah Odho, Hamza Arain
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article used Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), Extra Trees (ET), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) for fault detection and classification in electrical power distribution network. The study covers the detection and classification of different fault conditions like line to ground fault, double line fault, double to ground fault and three phase faults along with normal condition (no fault). The experimental results demonstrated that ensemble methods, particularly RF, XGBoost, and ET, significantly outperformed the individual models, achieving high accuracy rates exceeding 99%. The ET model emerged as the best performer, showcasing exceptional precision, recall, and F1-scores, with very few misclassifications as evidenced by the confusion matrices.

Mehran University of Engineering and Technology (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Electricity Theft Detection Techniques
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fault Detection and Classification in Electrical Power Distribution Network Through Machine Learning — Rana E. Ahmed, Ziad M. Ali, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS