Evaluation of Predictive and Heuristic Control Techniques for Buck Converters Using MPC, PID, and Fuzzy Logic

In power electronics, the performance of buck converters is crucial for efficient and effective voltage regulation and power management. Conventional Techniques in Control Systems includes Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) that are highly popular for their simplicity and efficiency but advanced intelligent techniques in control systems include Model Predictive Control (MPC) and Fuzzy Logic Control (FLC) as well. This study evaluates and compares these three control strategies—PID, FLC, and MPC—based on main performance metrics: rise time, settling time, overshoot, undershoot, and peak time. The PID controller demonstrated balanced performance with a rise time of 3.7444×10<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">−4</sup> s, settling time of 0.0152 s, and overshoot of 57.7626%. FLC showed improvements, particularly in minimizing overshoot (47.8383%) and maintaining a faster settling time of 0.0148 s. MPC exhibited the fastest response with a rise time of 1.9157×10<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">−4</sup> s and settling time of 0.0078 s, but faced challenges with a significant overshoot of 105.3098%. Results suggest that MPC is highly effective in achieving rapid response and stabilization, FLC excels in minimizing overshoot and providing precise control, while PID maintains a good balance but with slower response and higher overshoot. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate control strategies based on specific performance requirements in buck converter applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/inmic64792.2024.11004343
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced DC-DC Converters
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Predictive and Heuristic Control Techniques for Buck Converters Using MPC, PID, and Fuzzy Logic

Dur‐e‐Zehra Baig, Muhammad Ayaz, Mohd. Sultan Ibrahim Shaik Dawood, Muhammad Armughan Ul Haq et al.
2 citations
Advanced DC-DC Converters
0.42
article

Evaluation of Predictive and Heuristic Control Techniques for Buck Converters Using MPC, PID, and Fuzzy Logic

Dur‐e‐Zehra Baig, Muhammad Ayaz, Mohd. Sultan Ibrahim Shaik Dawood, Muhammad Armughan Ul Haq, Shazil Ejaz, Laksh Rathi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In power electronics, the performance of buck converters is crucial for efficient and effective voltage regulation and power management. Conventional Techniques in Control Systems includes Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) that are highly popular for their simplicity and efficiency but advanced intelligent techniques in control systems include Model Predictive Control (MPC) and Fuzzy Logic Control (FLC) as well. This study evaluates and compares these three control strategies—PID, FLC, and MPC—based on main performance metrics: rise time, settling time, overshoot, undershoot, and peak time. The PID controller demonstrated balanced performance with a rise time of 3.7444×10<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">−4</sup> s, settling time of 0.0152 s, and overshoot of 57.7626%. FLC showed improvements, particularly in minimizing overshoot (47.8383%) and maintaining a faster settling time of 0.0148 s. MPC exhibited the fastest response with a rise time of 1.9157×10<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">−4</sup> s and settling time of 0.0078 s, but faced challenges with a significant overshoot of 105.3098%. Results suggest that MPC is highly effective in achieving rapid response and stabilization, FLC excels in minimizing overshoot and providing precise control, while PID maintains a good balance but with slower response and higher overshoot. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate control strategies based on specific performance requirements in buck converter applications.

University of Swabi (PK)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Advanced DC-DC Converters
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.