A Qualitative Study of Bibliographic Data Sources and Retrieval Mechanisms for Computational Research

In the era of big data, selecting appropriate bibliographic data sources is crucial for researchers. However, differences in database functionalities, accessibility, and ease of use pose challenges for large-scale bibliometric analysis. APIs are key for automating data retrieval, but their varying performance and availability complicates selection. This study provides a comparative analysis of eight data sources—Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), Dimensions, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar (SS), Google Scholar (GS), Scite.ai, and Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG)—and their APIs. We examine accessibility, search functionalities, metadata availability, and ease of use. Our results show that while each API supports core research needs, OpenAlex and SS offer the most user-friendly experiences with minimal technical requirements, while the GS API is the most cumbersome. These insights help researchers and developers select appropriate bibliometric data sources for computational research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/inmic64792.2024.11004418
Primary Topic
Semantic Web and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Qualitative Study of Bibliographic Data Sources and Retrieval Mechanisms for Computational Research

Muhammad Qasim Pasta, Aiza Imran
Semantic Web and Ontologies
article

A Qualitative Study of Bibliographic Data Sources and Retrieval Mechanisms for Computational Research

Muhammad Qasim Pasta, Aiza Imran
article en

Abstract

In the era of big data, selecting appropriate bibliographic data sources is crucial for researchers. However, differences in database functionalities, accessibility, and ease of use pose challenges for large-scale bibliometric analysis. APIs are key for automating data retrieval, but their varying performance and availability complicates selection. This study provides a comparative analysis of eight data sources—Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), Dimensions, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar (SS), Google Scholar (GS), Scite.ai, and Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG)—and their APIs. We examine accessibility, search functionalities, metadata availability, and ease of use. Our results show that while each API supports core research needs, OpenAlex and SS offer the most user-friendly experiences with minimal technical requirements, while the GS API is the most cumbersome. These insights help researchers and developers select appropriate bibliometric data sources for computational research.

Habib University (PK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Semantic Web and Ontologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.