Sample Complexity Bounds for Scalar Parameter Estimation Under Quantum Differential Privacy

This paper presents tight upper and lower bounds for minimum number of samples (copies of a quantum state) required to attain a prescribed accuracy (measured by error variance) for scalar parameters estimation using unbiased estimators under quantum local differential privacy for qubits. Particularly, the best-case (optimal) scenario is considered by minimizing the sample complexity over all differentially-private channels; the worst-case channels can be arbitrarily uninformative and render the problem ill-defined. In the small privacy budget regime, i.e., 1, the sample complexity scales as (-2). This bound matches that of classical parameter estimation under local differential privacy. The lower bound however loosens in the large privacy budget regime, i.e., 1. The upper bound for the minimum number of samples is generalized to qudits (with dimension d) resulting in sample complexity of O(d-2).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Control Systems Letters
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/lcsys.2025.3570978
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sample Complexity Bounds for Scalar Parameter Estimation Under Quantum Differential Privacy

Farhad Farokhi
IEEE Control Systems Letters
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

Sample Complexity Bounds for Scalar Parameter Estimation Under Quantum Differential Privacy

Farhad Farokhi
article en

Abstract

This paper presents tight upper and lower bounds for minimum number of samples (copies of a quantum state) required to attain a prescribed accuracy (measured by error variance) for scalar parameters estimation using unbiased estimators under quantum local differential privacy for qubits. Particularly, the best-case (optimal) scenario is considered by minimizing the sample complexity over all differentially-private channels; the worst-case channels can be arbitrarily uninformative and render the problem ill-defined. In the small privacy budget regime, i.e., 1, the sample complexity scales as (-2). This bound matches that of classical parameter estimation under local differential privacy. The lower bound however loosens in the large privacy budget regime, i.e., 1. The upper bound for the minimum number of samples is generalized to qudits (with dimension d) resulting in sample complexity of O(d-2).

IEEE Control Systems LettersVol. 9
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.