Governing High-Risk Technologies in a Fragmented World: Geopolitical Tensions, Regulatory Gaps, and Institutional Barriers to Global Cooperation

Abstract The global governance of high-risk technologies—including nuclear technology, artificial intelligence (AI), quantum computing, biotechnology, and gene editing—faces mounting challenges due to geopolitical tensions, regulatory gaps, and institutional barriers. Drawing on sociopolitical theories such as Beck’s Risk Society , Giddens’ Runaway World , and Perrow’s Normal Accidents , this paper examines the complexities of regulating rapidly advancing technologies within a fragmented global landscape. Unlike previous industrial revolutions, today’s technological transformations are unfolding at an unprecedented pace, outstripping existing governance structures and exacerbating regulatory asymmetries and geopolitical rivalries. The national securitization of technology and the absence of binding international frameworks hinder effective cooperation, fueling an unregulated “technological race.” Addressing these governance challenges requires multilateral collaboration, legally binding treaties, and independent regulatory bodies with enforcement capabilities. Without coordinated global efforts, unchecked technological proliferation may heighten security risks, deepen global inequalities, and erode trust in regulatory institutions. This paper critically evaluates current governance deficiencies and explores pathways toward more effective and inclusive global cooperation in managing high-risk technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-025-00445-4
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Biotechnology and Related Fields
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governing High-Risk Technologies in a Fragmented World: Geopolitical Tensions, Regulatory Gaps, and Institutional Barriers to Global Cooperation

Jieli Li
7 citations
Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
Biotechnology and Related Fields
13.15
article

Governing High-Risk Technologies in a Fragmented World: Geopolitical Tensions, Regulatory Gaps, and Institutional Barriers to Global Cooperation

Jieli Li
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract The global governance of high-risk technologies—including nuclear technology, artificial intelligence (AI), quantum computing, biotechnology, and gene editing—faces mounting challenges due to geopolitical tensions, regulatory gaps, and institutional barriers. Drawing on sociopolitical theories such as Beck’s Risk Society , Giddens’ Runaway World , and Perrow’s Normal Accidents , this paper examines the complexities of regulating rapidly advancing technologies within a fragmented global landscape. Unlike previous industrial revolutions, today’s technological transformations are unfolding at an unprecedented pace, outstripping existing governance structures and exacerbating regulatory asymmetries and geopolitical rivalries. The national securitization of technology and the absence of binding international frameworks hinder effective cooperation, fueling an unregulated “technological race.” Addressing these governance challenges requires multilateral collaboration, legally binding treaties, and independent regulatory bodies with enforcement capabilities. Without coordinated global efforts, unchecked technological proliferation may heighten security risks, deepen global inequalities, and erode trust in regulatory institutions. This paper critically evaluates current governance deficiencies and explores pathways toward more effective and inclusive global cooperation in managing high-risk technologies.

Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 19(1)
Ohio University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Biotechnology and Related Fields
13.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Governing High-Risk Technologies in a Fragmented World: Geopolitical Tensions, Regulatory Gaps, and Institutional Barriers to Global Cooperation — Jieli Li · Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS