The Effect of Patient Involvement in Implant Size Selection on Satisfaction With Breast Size: An Analysis of 1840 Primary Augmentations

Abstract Background Aesthetic breast surgery is a specific field in which the aim is not to achieve any universally defined standard but to meet the patient's expectations. Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of women who were dissatisfied with their breast size following primary breast augmentation and opted to undergo revision surgery. The study presents and verifies an algorithm for breast implant selection which involves the patient in the decision-making process. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of medical charts covering the period from January 2012 to December 2022 from 1 private center. The final analysis included 1840 patients. All had implants chosen according to the Patient Decision-Making Process on Implant Size Selection (PIS) algorithm. Results Of the studied cases, 18 opted to undergo implant exchange due to dissatisfaction with breast size (0.98%). This group differed significantly from the controls (n = 1822) in the following aspects: lower BMI during primary procedure, lower mean implant volume, and shorter follow-up. In all but 2 women, mean BMI increased by 1 unit before revisional surgery (from 19.7 to 20.6 kg/m2). Conclusions Dissatisfaction with breast implant size is a rare cause of revision in breast augmentation surgery when the patient is involved in the final decision on the volume of the implants. The PIS algorithm yielded a rate of dissatisfaction with breast size of less than 1% in long-term follow-up. Level of Evidence: 4 (Therapeutic)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf085
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Patient Involvement in Implant Size Selection on Satisfaction With Breast Size: An Analysis of 1840 Primary Augmentations

Małgorzata Kolenda, Anna Kasielska‐Trojan, Szymon Kołacz, Jerzy Kolasiński
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

The Effect of Patient Involvement in Implant Size Selection on Satisfaction With Breast Size: An Analysis of 1840 Primary Augmentations

Małgorzata Kolenda, Anna Kasielska‐Trojan, Szymon Kołacz, Jerzy Kolasiński
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Aesthetic breast surgery is a specific field in which the aim is not to achieve any universally defined standard but to meet the patient's expectations. Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of women who were dissatisfied with their breast size following primary breast augmentation and opted to undergo revision surgery. The study presents and verifies an algorithm for breast implant selection which involves the patient in the decision-making process. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of medical charts covering the period from January 2012 to December 2022 from 1 private center. The final analysis included 1840 patients. All had implants chosen according to the Patient Decision-Making Process on Implant Size Selection (PIS) algorithm. Results Of the studied cases, 18 opted to undergo implant exchange due to dissatisfaction with breast size (0.98%). This group differed significantly from the controls (n = 1822) in the following aspects: lower BMI during primary procedure, lower mean implant volume, and shorter follow-up. In all but 2 women, mean BMI increased by 1 unit before revisional surgery (from 19.7 to 20.6 kg/m2). Conclusions Dissatisfaction with breast implant size is a rare cause of revision in breast augmentation surgery when the patient is involved in the final decision on the volume of the implants. The PIS algorithm yielded a rate of dissatisfaction with breast size of less than 1% in long-term follow-up. Level of Evidence: 4 (Therapeutic)

Aesthetic Surgery JournalVol. 45(9)
American Society of Plastic Surgeons (US), Medical University of Lodz (PL)
Uniwersytet Łódzki
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.