Don’t torque like that

Context. Changes in the rotational period observed in various magnetized accreting sources are generally attributed to the interaction between the infalling plasma and the large-scale magnetic field of the accretor. A number of models have been proposed to link these changes to the mass accretion rate, based on different assumptions on the relevant physical processes and system parameters. For X-ray binaries with neutron stars, with the help of precise measurements of the spin periods provided by current instrumentation, these models provide a way to infer such parameters as the strength of the dipolar field and a distance to the system. Often, the obtained magnetic field strength values contradict those from other methods used to obtain magnetic field estimates. Aims. We want to compare the results of several of the proposed accretion models. To this end, an example application of these models to data was performed. Methods. We reformulated the set of disk accretion torque models in a way that their parameterizations are directly comparable. The application of the reformulated models is discussed and demonstrated using Fermi/GBM and Swift/BAT monitoring data covering several X-ray outbursts of the accreting pulsar 4U 0115+63. Results. We find that most of the models under consideration are able to describe the observations to a high degree of accuracy and with little indication that one model is preferred over the others. Even so, the derived parameters from these models show a large spread. Specifically, the magnetic field strength ranges over one order of magnitude for the different models. This indicates that the results are heavily influenced by systematic uncertainties. Conclusions. The application of torque models provides a generic way to access system parameters of the accreting object. The values obtained via these models must be treated with caution, since the systematics of the models must be taken into account. Our example suggests that the current state of analytic torque models does not allow for quantitative measurements of the magnetic field of an accreting object. Systematic application to a sample of sources with known magnetic fields and distances will provide a selection criterion between models in the future.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202553809
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Scientific Research and Discoveries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Don’t torque like that

Jakob Stierhof, G. Vasilopoulos, P. Kretschmar, R. Rothschild et al.
4 citations
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Scientific Research and Discoveries
5.29
article

Don’t torque like that

Jakob Stierhof, G. Vasilopoulos, P. Kretschmar, R. Rothschild, P. Thalhammer, I. El Mellah, J. Wilms, Christian Malacaria, Ralf Ballhausen, E. Sokolova-Lapa, K. Pottschmidt, Nicolas Zalot, K. Berger
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Context. Changes in the rotational period observed in various magnetized accreting sources are generally attributed to the interaction between the infalling plasma and the large-scale magnetic field of the accretor. A number of models have been proposed to link these changes to the mass accretion rate, based on different assumptions on the relevant physical processes and system parameters. For X-ray binaries with neutron stars, with the help of precise measurements of the spin periods provided by current instrumentation, these models provide a way to infer such parameters as the strength of the dipolar field and a distance to the system. Often, the obtained magnetic field strength values contradict those from other methods used to obtain magnetic field estimates. Aims. We want to compare the results of several of the proposed accretion models. To this end, an example application of these models to data was performed. Methods. We reformulated the set of disk accretion torque models in a way that their parameterizations are directly comparable. The application of the reformulated models is discussed and demonstrated using Fermi/GBM and Swift/BAT monitoring data covering several X-ray outbursts of the accreting pulsar 4U 0115+63. Results. We find that most of the models under consideration are able to describe the observations to a high degree of accuracy and with little indication that one model is preferred over the others. Even so, the derived parameters from these models show a large spread. Specifically, the magnetic field strength ranges over one order of magnitude for the different models. This indicates that the results are heavily influenced by systematic uncertainties. Conclusions. The application of torque models provides a generic way to access system parameters of the accreting object. The values obtained via these models must be treated with caution, since the systematics of the models must be taken into account. Our example suggests that the current state of analytic torque models does not allow for quantitative measurements of the magnetic field of an accreting object. Systematic application to a sample of sources with known magnetic fields and distances will provide a selection criterion between models in the future.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 698
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Scientific Research and Discoveries
5.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.