“Time to die many times”: Negotiating Time in Letters between Couples during the First World War

For young couples separated during the First World War, letters would become the primary means of maintaining their relationship. The narrative of time, both the subjective experience of time and the constant awareness of clock time, is strikingly visible throughout a range of correspondence and is central to how these writers negotiate their relationship through years of separation. This paper explores how the pain of separation was measured through time, as writers express the tensions between present separation, where letters construct the intimacy that was denied the couples in actuality, an idealized past togetherness, and a future time when war, and their separation, would be over. Yet these correspondents were not naïve enough to assume a future. Their lives were suspended: any future was conditional and precarious. Narrating their time together on a past leave, or fantasizing about a future, or using clock time as a point of intimate contact when they agreed on a particular time of the evening when each would think of the other, offered ways to contend with the precarity they are forced to face. Written to defy time, these letters are a legacy that allow us to enter the painful immediacy of that wartime experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Epistolary Studies
Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51734/gfecr215
Primary Topic
World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Time to die many times”: Negotiating Time in Letters between Couples during the First World War

Carol Acton
The Journal of Epistolary Studies
World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
article

“Time to die many times”: Negotiating Time in Letters between Couples during the First World War

Carol Acton
article en

Abstract

For young couples separated during the First World War, letters would become the primary means of maintaining their relationship. The narrative of time, both the subjective experience of time and the constant awareness of clock time, is strikingly visible throughout a range of correspondence and is central to how these writers negotiate their relationship through years of separation. This paper explores how the pain of separation was measured through time, as writers express the tensions between present separation, where letters construct the intimacy that was denied the couples in actuality, an idealized past togetherness, and a future time when war, and their separation, would be over. Yet these correspondents were not naïve enough to assume a future. Their lives were suspended: any future was conditional and precarious. Narrating their time together on a past leave, or fantasizing about a future, or using clock time as a point of intimate contact when they agreed on a particular time of the evening when each would think of the other, offered ways to contend with the precarity they are forced to face. Written to defy time, these letters are a legacy that allow us to enter the painful immediacy of that wartime experience.

The Journal of Epistolary StudiesVol. 4(1)
University of Waterloo (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.