A cognitive science framework could prevent harmful public policy decisions involving AI

AI has the potential to help governments become more efficient and transparent and better able to serve their citizens. However, using AI in designing and implementing policies comes with challenges and risks. As in other arenas, it can lead to job loss and privacy infringements. But this article concerns another, more insidious risk: Using AI can amplify the tendency of people who apply the tools to rely on intuitive rather than deliberative reasoning, which, in the realm of governance, can result in flawed policies that can harm the public. This article introduces a framework, informed by cognitive science research, for helping government policymakers understand the risks of human–AI collaborations and mitigate those risks through inserting more deliberative reasoning into each aspect of these collaborations. By applying the framework to case studies, the article also demonstrates its potential for preventing disastrous outcomes from AI’s use in policy. Overall, the framework is meant to help policy professionals navigate AI’s complexities and produce effective, efficient policies that include procedural safeguards for protecting citizens from harm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Science & Policy
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23794607251336099
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A cognitive science framework could prevent harmful public policy decisions involving AI

Dirk Van Rooy
2 citations
Behavioral Science & Policy
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
article

A cognitive science framework could prevent harmful public policy decisions involving AI

Dirk Van Rooy
article en
2 citations

Abstract

AI has the potential to help governments become more efficient and transparent and better able to serve their citizens. However, using AI in designing and implementing policies comes with challenges and risks. As in other arenas, it can lead to job loss and privacy infringements. But this article concerns another, more insidious risk: Using AI can amplify the tendency of people who apply the tools to rely on intuitive rather than deliberative reasoning, which, in the realm of governance, can result in flawed policies that can harm the public. This article introduces a framework, informed by cognitive science research, for helping government policymakers understand the risks of human–AI collaborations and mitigate those risks through inserting more deliberative reasoning into each aspect of these collaborations. By applying the framework to case studies, the article also demonstrates its potential for preventing disastrous outcomes from AI’s use in policy. Overall, the framework is meant to help policy professionals navigate AI’s complexities and produce effective, efficient policies that include procedural safeguards for protecting citizens from harm.

Behavioral Science & PolicyVol. 11(1)
University of Antwerp (BE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.