Benchmarking the Confidence of Large Language Models in Answering Clinical Questions: Cross-Sectional Evaluation Study
Better-performing LLMs show more aligned overall confidence levels. However, even the most accurate models still show minimal variation in confidence between right and wrong answers. This may limit their safe use in clinical settings. Addressing overconfidence could involve refining calibration methods, performing domain-specific fine-tuning, and involving human oversight when decisions carry high risks. Further research is needed to improve these strategies before broader clinical adoption of LLMs.
Authors
- Benjamin Scott Glicksberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4515-8090)
- Eyal Klang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4567-3108)
- Mahmud Omar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0438-0827)
- Girish N. Nadkarni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6319-4314)
- Reem Agbareia
Institutions
- Hadassah Medical Center (IL)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- JMIR Medical Informatics
- Published
- 2025-05-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2196/66917
- Citations
- 21
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 13.74