Deep Gaussian process priors for Bayesian image reconstruction

Abstract In image reconstruction, an accurate quantification of uncertainty is of great importance for informed decision making. Here, the Bayesian approach to inverse problems can be used: the image is represented through a random function that incorporates prior information which is then updated through Bayes’ formula. However, finding a prior is difficult, as images often exhibit non-stationary effects and multi-scale behavior. Thus, usual Gaussian process priors are not suitable. Deep Gaussian processes, on the other hand, encode non-stationary behavior in a natural way through their hierarchical structure. To apply Bayes’ formula, one commonly employs a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. In the case of deep Gaussian processes, sampling is especially challenging in high dimensions: the associated covariance matrices are large, dense, and changing from sample to sample. A popular strategy towards decreasing computational complexity is to view Gaussian processes as the solutions to a fractional stochastic partial differential equation (SPDE). In this work, we investigate efficient computational strategies to solve the fractional SPDEs occurring in deep Gaussian process sampling, as well as MCMC algorithms to sample from the posterior. Namely, we combine rational approximation and a determinant-free sampling approach to achieve sampling via the fractional SPDE. We test our techniques in standard Bayesian image reconstruction problems: upsampling, edge detection, and computed tomography. In these examples, we show that choosing a non-stationary prior such as the deep GP over a stationary GP can improve the reconstruction. Moreover, our approach enables us to compare results for a range of fractional and non-fractional regularity parameter values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Inverse Problems
Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/add9be
Primary Topic
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Gaussian process priors for Bayesian image reconstruction

Jonas Latz, Aretha L. Teckentrup, Simon Urbainczyk
Inverse Problems
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
article

Deep Gaussian process priors for Bayesian image reconstruction

Jonas Latz, Aretha L. Teckentrup, Simon Urbainczyk
article en

Abstract

Abstract In image reconstruction, an accurate quantification of uncertainty is of great importance for informed decision making. Here, the Bayesian approach to inverse problems can be used: the image is represented through a random function that incorporates prior information which is then updated through Bayes’ formula. However, finding a prior is difficult, as images often exhibit non-stationary effects and multi-scale behavior. Thus, usual Gaussian process priors are not suitable. Deep Gaussian processes, on the other hand, encode non-stationary behavior in a natural way through their hierarchical structure. To apply Bayes’ formula, one commonly employs a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. In the case of deep Gaussian processes, sampling is especially challenging in high dimensions: the associated covariance matrices are large, dense, and changing from sample to sample. A popular strategy towards decreasing computational complexity is to view Gaussian processes as the solutions to a fractional stochastic partial differential equation (SPDE). In this work, we investigate efficient computational strategies to solve the fractional SPDEs occurring in deep Gaussian process sampling, as well as MCMC algorithms to sample from the posterior. Namely, we combine rational approximation and a determinant-free sampling approach to achieve sampling via the fractional SPDE. We test our techniques in standard Bayesian image reconstruction problems: upsampling, edge detection, and computed tomography. In these examples, we show that choosing a non-stationary prior such as the deep GP over a stationary GP can improve the reconstruction. Moreover, our approach enables us to compare results for a range of fractional and non-fractional regularity parameter values.

Inverse ProblemsVol. 41(6)
University of Manchester (GB), Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences (GB)
Heriot-Watt University, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Division of Mathematical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.