Being an ethnographic researcher in a modern workplace: advantages and challenges of digital ethnography

Purpose As digitalization changes work and organizations, the ethnographic research field and fieldwork become more complex. In this paper, we discuss the advantages and challenges of digital ethnography, drawing on insights from our study. Design/methodology/approach We reflect on our experiences using digital ethnography to study the use of digital technology in informal workplace learning within a knowledge work context. The research topic and setting posed methodological challenges, which we addressed through digital ethnography. Findings The paper provides novel insights for studying a modern workplace, where physical and digital environments intertwine. The main focus of this research was on digital environments; however, with digital ethnography, we can capture a holistic perspective on knowledge work. We describe how we constructed the fluid and emergent research field in interaction with the target organization and its staff, collecting versatile data. Through examples from our fieldwork, we illustrate how we used method triangulation to capture the multisitedness of work. We also reflect on the challenges encountered, such as in relation to access and ethical considerations. We argue that digital ethnography is a particularly suitable methodology for researching modern knowledge work and its environments. Originality/value The paper demonstrates how digital ethnography can be used to study modern workplaces, where digital environments play a significant role, thereby expanding its uses in workplace research. We suggest that by viewing workplaces – and, thus, research fields – as phygital, a combination of physical and digital, we can transcend the online-offline dichotomy and adopt a more holistic perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Ethnography
Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/joe-11-2024-0085
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Being an ethnographic researcher in a modern workplace: advantages and challenges of digital ethnography

Raija Hämäläinen, Anne Karhapää, Jenni Rikala, Johanna Pöysä‐Tarhonen
5 citations
Journal of Organizational Ethnography
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
21.01
article

Being an ethnographic researcher in a modern workplace: advantages and challenges of digital ethnography

Raija Hämäläinen, Anne Karhapää, Jenni Rikala, Johanna Pöysä‐Tarhonen
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Purpose As digitalization changes work and organizations, the ethnographic research field and fieldwork become more complex. In this paper, we discuss the advantages and challenges of digital ethnography, drawing on insights from our study. Design/methodology/approach We reflect on our experiences using digital ethnography to study the use of digital technology in informal workplace learning within a knowledge work context. The research topic and setting posed methodological challenges, which we addressed through digital ethnography. Findings The paper provides novel insights for studying a modern workplace, where physical and digital environments intertwine. The main focus of this research was on digital environments; however, with digital ethnography, we can capture a holistic perspective on knowledge work. We describe how we constructed the fluid and emergent research field in interaction with the target organization and its staff, collecting versatile data. Through examples from our fieldwork, we illustrate how we used method triangulation to capture the multisitedness of work. We also reflect on the challenges encountered, such as in relation to access and ethical considerations. We argue that digital ethnography is a particularly suitable methodology for researching modern knowledge work and its environments. Originality/value The paper demonstrates how digital ethnography can be used to study modern workplaces, where digital environments play a significant role, thereby expanding its uses in workplace research. We suggest that by viewing workplaces – and, thus, research fields – as phygital, a combination of physical and digital, we can transcend the online-offline dichotomy and adopt a more holistic perspective.

Journal of Organizational EthnographyVol. 14(2)
Research Institute of the Finnish Economy (FI), University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Suomen Kulttuurirahasto
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
21.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.