Predicting and monitoring response to head and neck cancer radiotherapy using multimodality imaging and radiobiological digital twin simulations

<i>Objective.</i>To predict radiotherapy treatment response for head and neck cancer (HNC) using multimodality imaging and personalized radiobiological modeling.<i>Approach.</i>A mechanistic radiobiological model was combined with multi-modality imaging data from diffusion weighted-magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography scans with [<sup>18</sup>F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and [<sup>18</sup>F]Fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) tracers to develop personalized treatment response models for human papilloma virus associated HNC patients undergoing chemo-radiotherapy. Models were initialized to incorporate patient-specific imaging and updated to reflect longitudinal measurements of nodal gross tumor volume throughout treatment. Prediction accuracy was assessed based on mean absolute error (MAE) of weekly volume predictions and in predicting locoregional recurrence (LRR) following treatment.<i>Main results.</i>Personalized modeling based on pretreatment imaging significantly improved longitudinal volume prediction accuracy and correlation with measurement compared with a generic population model (MAE = 23.4 ± 10.0% vs 24.9 ± 9.0%,<i>p</i>= 0.002 on paired<i>t</i>-test,<i>R</i>= 0.82 vs 0.72). Adding volume measurements from weeks 1 and 2 further improved prediction accuracy for subsequent weeks (MAE = 12.5 ± 8.1%, 10.7 ± 9.9%). When incorporating feedback with longitudinal measurements, penalizing large deviations from pretreatment model parameters using a variational regularization method was necessary to maintain model stability. Model-predicted volumes based on baseline + week-1 information significantly improved LRR prediction compared with week-1 volume data alone (area under the curve, AUC = 0.83 vs 0.77,<i>p</i>= 0.03) and was similar to prediction using week-3 volume data (AUC = 0.83 vs 0.85,<i>p</i>= non-significant).<i>Significance.</i>The proposed approach, which integrates clinical imaging and radiobiological principles, could be a basis to guide pretreatment prescription personalization as well as on-treatment adaptations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/add9de
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting and monitoring response to head and neck cancer radiotherapy using multimodality imaging and radiobiological digital twin simulations

Bill H. Diplas, Heiko M. Schöder, Milan Grkovski, Ramesh Paudyal et al.
1 citations
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
1.88
article

Predicting and monitoring response to head and neck cancer radiotherapy using multimodality imaging and radiobiological digital twin simulations

Bill H. Diplas, Heiko M. Schöder, Milan Grkovski, Ramesh Paudyal, Joseph O. Deasy, Nadeem Riaz, James E. Han, Vaios Hatzoglou, Michalis Aristophanous, Amita Shukla‐Dave, Nancy Y. Lee, Eric Aliotta, Jeho Jeong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>To predict radiotherapy treatment response for head and neck cancer (HNC) using multimodality imaging and personalized radiobiological modeling.<i>Approach.</i>A mechanistic radiobiological model was combined with multi-modality imaging data from diffusion weighted-magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography scans with [<sup>18</sup>F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and [<sup>18</sup>F]Fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) tracers to develop personalized treatment response models for human papilloma virus associated HNC patients undergoing chemo-radiotherapy. Models were initialized to incorporate patient-specific imaging and updated to reflect longitudinal measurements of nodal gross tumor volume throughout treatment. Prediction accuracy was assessed based on mean absolute error (MAE) of weekly volume predictions and in predicting locoregional recurrence (LRR) following treatment.<i>Main results.</i>Personalized modeling based on pretreatment imaging significantly improved longitudinal volume prediction accuracy and correlation with measurement compared with a generic population model (MAE = 23.4 ± 10.0% vs 24.9 ± 9.0%,<i>p</i>= 0.002 on paired<i>t</i>-test,<i>R</i>= 0.82 vs 0.72). Adding volume measurements from weeks 1 and 2 further improved prediction accuracy for subsequent weeks (MAE = 12.5 ± 8.1%, 10.7 ± 9.9%). When incorporating feedback with longitudinal measurements, penalizing large deviations from pretreatment model parameters using a variational regularization method was necessary to maintain model stability. Model-predicted volumes based on baseline + week-1 information significantly improved LRR prediction compared with week-1 volume data alone (area under the curve, AUC = 0.83 vs 0.77,<i>p</i>= 0.03) and was similar to prediction using week-3 volume data (AUC = 0.83 vs 0.85,<i>p</i>= non-significant).<i>Significance.</i>The proposed approach, which integrates clinical imaging and radiobiological principles, could be a basis to guide pretreatment prescription personalization as well as on-treatment adaptations.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 70(11)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.