Considering greenhouse gas emissions from feed production in diet formulation for dairy cows as a means of reducing the carbon footprint

Dairy production often faces conflicting goals, such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions, increasing food production and achieving self-sufficiency without transgressing planetary boundaries. This study examined ways to decrease emissions intensity per kg of milk from high-producing cows by selecting feed ingredients with a low carbon footprint while also considering local alternatives. Diets comprising of grass-legume mixture silage and three concentrate mixtures (standard commercial, based on by-products, and domestic crops grown on-farm) were randomly allotted to three groups of high-producing Swedish Holstein cows (N = 48). Over 7 weeks, no differences were observed (mean ± SEM) in feed DM intake (commercial: 24.3, by-products: 24.7, domestic: 24.2 kg/day, ± 0.51 kg/day), energy-corrected milk (ECM) yield (commercial: 38.3, by-products: 38.5, domestic: 37.8, ± 0.98 kg/day) or enteric methane production (commercial: 387, by-products: 378, domestic: 402 g/day, ± 17.3 g/day) among the diets. However, an evaluation of the primary carbon footprint of feed production (excluding transportation emissions) showed that the by-products and domestic diets gave lower emissions than the commercial diet, 9.4, 10.2, and 11.9 Feed CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents (CO<sub>2-eq</sub>) kg/day, respectively (SEM: ± 0.38 Feed CO<sub>2-eq</sub> kg/day). The emission intensity, expressed as feed emissions per kilogram of ECM yield, showed that the by-product-based and domestic diets generated lower carbon footprints, with emissions of 254 and 284 g Feed CO<sub>2-eq</sub>/kg ECM, respectively, in comparison to 320 g Feed CO<sub>2-eq</sub>/kg ECM observed for the commercial diet (SEM: ± 10.7 g Feed CO<sub>2-eq</sub>/kg ECM). Considering greenhouse gas emissions from feed production in diet formulation resulted in a lower overall feed carbon footprint and lower emission intensity per ECM. These findings can assist in formulating dairy rations for high-yielding dairy cows that balance conflicting goals while maintaining productivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
animal
Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2025.101544
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considering greenhouse gas emissions from feed production in diet formulation for dairy cows as a means of reducing the carbon footprint

Ulf Sonesson, Markos Managos, Mikaela Lindberg, Sigrid Agenäs et al.
2 citations
animal
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
3.43
article

Considering greenhouse gas emissions from feed production in diet formulation for dairy cows as a means of reducing the carbon footprint

Ulf Sonesson, Markos Managos, Mikaela Lindberg, Sigrid Agenäs, Cecilia Lindahl
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Dairy production often faces conflicting goals, such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions, increasing food production and achieving self-sufficiency without transgressing planetary boundaries. This study examined ways to decrease emissions intensity per kg of milk from high-producing cows by selecting feed ingredients with a low carbon footprint while also considering local alternatives. Diets comprising of grass-legume mixture silage and three concentrate mixtures (standard commercial, based on by-products, and domestic crops grown on-farm) were randomly allotted to three groups of high-producing Swedish Holstein cows (N = 48). Over 7 weeks, no differences were observed (mean ± SEM) in feed DM intake (commercial: 24.3, by-products: 24.7, domestic: 24.2 kg/day, ± 0.51 kg/day), energy-corrected milk (ECM) yield (commercial: 38.3, by-products: 38.5, domestic: 37.8, ± 0.98 kg/day) or enteric methane production (commercial: 387, by-products: 378, domestic: 402 g/day, ± 17.3 g/day) among the diets. However, an evaluation of the primary carbon footprint of feed production (excluding transportation emissions) showed that the by-products and domestic diets gave lower emissions than the commercial diet, 9.4, 10.2, and 11.9 Feed CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents (CO<sub>2-eq</sub>) kg/day, respectively (SEM: ± 0.38 Feed CO<sub>2-eq</sub> kg/day). The emission intensity, expressed as feed emissions per kilogram of ECM yield, showed that the by-product-based and domestic diets generated lower carbon footprints, with emissions of 254 and 284 g Feed CO<sub>2-eq</sub>/kg ECM, respectively, in comparison to 320 g Feed CO<sub>2-eq</sub>/kg ECM observed for the commercial diet (SEM: ± 10.7 g Feed CO<sub>2-eq</sub>/kg ECM). Considering greenhouse gas emissions from feed production in diet formulation resulted in a lower overall feed carbon footprint and lower emission intensity per ECM. These findings can assist in formulating dairy rations for high-yielding dairy cows that balance conflicting goals while maintaining productivity.

animalVol. 19(7)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Lantmännen (SE), Business Region Göteborg (Sweden) (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.