Comparative study of Vibe 2-Zone and Multiple Vibe 2-Zone combustion models on combustion, performance, and emissions of a diesel engine

• Vibe 2-Zone and multiple Vibe 2-Zone combustion models are investigated. • Their performance, combustion, and emissions are compared. • Multiple Vibe 2-Zone model produces higher cylinder pressure and temperature peaks than its counterpart at 15.47 and 2.07%, respectively. • Power and torque differences between two models are negligible, just 0.75 and 2.48%, respectively. • Their emissions differences are notable, with values up to 42.67, 7.52, and 11.34% for NOx, CO, and soot, respectively. This work evaluates the differences in combustion, performance, and emission characteristics between two combustion models of the Vibe 2-Zone and Multiple Vibe 2-Zone on a single cylinder diesel engine. The AVL Boost software was used to investigate the engine at its 85% load with differences in the PRs, ignition timings, and combustion durations. The simulation results based on the two combustion models will be analyzed and compared to show their similarities and differences. The findings indicate that there is an insignificant difference between the two models in terms of power, torque, and brake-specific fuel consumption. The highest differences between the two models are 0.75, 2.48, and 2.48% for power, torque, and brake specific fuel consumption, respectively. For peak cylinder temperature and pressure, the largest difference between the two models is 2.07% and 15.47%. The difference in emissions between the two models is quite significant, especially with NOx. The most considerable differences between the two models are 7.52%, 11.34%, and 42.67% for CO, soot, and NOx, respectively. The study highlights that the Vibe 2-Zone combustion model is preferable for engine performance simulations due to its advantages, including reduced input parameter requirements and time efficiency. However, the Multiple Vibe 2-Zone combustion model is recommended for greater accuracy, particularly in emission predictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Engineering
Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2025.100348
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of Vibe 2-Zone and Multiple Vibe 2-Zone combustion models on combustion, performance, and emissions of a diesel engine

L. Duong, Thang Viet Vu, Thong Duc Hong, Minh Quang Pham et al.
5 citations
Transportation Engineering
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
3.59
article

Comparative study of Vibe 2-Zone and Multiple Vibe 2-Zone combustion models on combustion, performance, and emissions of a diesel engine

L. Duong, Thang Viet Vu, Thong Duc Hong, Minh Quang Pham, Son Hoang, Hieu Xuan Vo
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Vibe 2-Zone and multiple Vibe 2-Zone combustion models are investigated. • Their performance, combustion, and emissions are compared. • Multiple Vibe 2-Zone model produces higher cylinder pressure and temperature peaks than its counterpart at 15.47 and 2.07%, respectively. • Power and torque differences between two models are negligible, just 0.75 and 2.48%, respectively. • Their emissions differences are notable, with values up to 42.67, 7.52, and 11.34% for NOx, CO, and soot, respectively. This work evaluates the differences in combustion, performance, and emission characteristics between two combustion models of the Vibe 2-Zone and Multiple Vibe 2-Zone on a single cylinder diesel engine. The AVL Boost software was used to investigate the engine at its 85% load with differences in the PRs, ignition timings, and combustion durations. The simulation results based on the two combustion models will be analyzed and compared to show their similarities and differences. The findings indicate that there is an insignificant difference between the two models in terms of power, torque, and brake-specific fuel consumption. The highest differences between the two models are 0.75, 2.48, and 2.48% for power, torque, and brake specific fuel consumption, respectively. For peak cylinder temperature and pressure, the largest difference between the two models is 2.07% and 15.47%. The difference in emissions between the two models is quite significant, especially with NOx. The most considerable differences between the two models are 7.52%, 11.34%, and 42.67% for CO, soot, and NOx, respectively. The study highlights that the Vibe 2-Zone combustion model is preferable for engine performance simulations due to its advantages, including reduced input parameter requirements and time efficiency. However, the Multiple Vibe 2-Zone combustion model is recommended for greater accuracy, particularly in emission predictions.

Transportation EngineeringVol. 20
Ho Chi Minh City University of Transport (VN), Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VN), Trường ĐH Nguyễn Tất Thành (VN), Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (VN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
3.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.