Unobserved expected returns in a diffusive price process: is filtering effective?

Abstract We consider a stock price that follows a diffusion process whose drift is mean-reverting and unobservable. We learn about the latent process by filtering the observed log-returns via the Kalman filter. The parameters of the latent process are estimated using two different methodologies. First, we employ the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm, a maximum likelihood method tailored for such settings. Next, we maximize the likelihood of the innovation process. We assess the estimation performance of both methodologies using simulated data. The surprising result is that even with 30 years of daily data, substantial estimation errors persist across many individual path realizations. We attempt to explain this finding by recognizing that the actual importance of the hidden factor within the observable process is determined by the ratio of their volatilities scaled by the inverse frequency of observations. This scaling factor renders the latent process elusive within the observed time-series.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soft Computing
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-025-10637-5
Primary Topic
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unobserved expected returns in a diffusive price process: is filtering effective?

Marco Nicolosi, Flavio Angelini, Paride Antonini
Soft Computing
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
article

Unobserved expected returns in a diffusive price process: is filtering effective?

Marco Nicolosi, Flavio Angelini, Paride Antonini
article en

Abstract

Abstract We consider a stock price that follows a diffusion process whose drift is mean-reverting and unobservable. We learn about the latent process by filtering the observed log-returns via the Kalman filter. The parameters of the latent process are estimated using two different methodologies. First, we employ the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm, a maximum likelihood method tailored for such settings. Next, we maximize the likelihood of the innovation process. We assess the estimation performance of both methodologies using simulated data. The surprising result is that even with 30 years of daily data, substantial estimation errors persist across many individual path realizations. We attempt to explain this finding by recognizing that the actual importance of the hidden factor within the observable process is determined by the ratio of their volatilities scaled by the inverse frequency of observations. This scaling factor renders the latent process elusive within the observed time-series.

Soft Computing
University of Perugia (IT), Link Campus University (IT)
Università degli Studi di Perugia
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unobserved expected returns in a diffusive price process: is filtering effective? — Marco Nicolosi, Flavio Angelini, et al. · Soft Computing (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS