Using an ecological framework to identify what might increase postdoctoral scholars’ sense of belonging in the workplace

Purpose Postdoctoral scholars can experience challenges leading to negative impacts on their personal and professional lives, including low levels of a sense of belonging (Yadav et al. 2020). While researchers have suggested needed improvements for better supporting the postdoctoral scholar workforce (Ålund et al., 2020), few studies have delved into postdoctoral scholars’ views on what would improve their belonging experiences in the workplace. The purpose of this study was to learn more about postdoctoral scholars’ experiences of belonging in the workplace in their own words. Design/methodology/approach The authors investigated postdoctoral scholars’ experiences with belonging through structured interviews and asked participants (n = 30 postdoctoral scholars working in the USA) how their sense of belonging could be increased in their workplace. Using an ecological model as a lens, the authors organize findings at policy, institutional and office/lab unit levels. Findings Postdoctoral scholars identified changes that could be made to increase their sense of belonging in the workplace, invoking a call to action within institutions of higher education and the broader research enterprise. Originality/value While previous research has found significant structural barriers to postdoctoral scholars’ sense of belonging, the research team specifically asked postdoctoral scholars to explain what would increase their sense of belonging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sgpe-05-2024-0055
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using an ecological framework to identify what might increase postdoctoral scholars’ sense of belonging in the workplace

Elizabeth A. Jach, Chelsea O’Brien
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
article

Using an ecological framework to identify what might increase postdoctoral scholars’ sense of belonging in the workplace

Elizabeth A. Jach, Chelsea O’Brien
article en

Abstract

Purpose Postdoctoral scholars can experience challenges leading to negative impacts on their personal and professional lives, including low levels of a sense of belonging (Yadav et al. 2020). While researchers have suggested needed improvements for better supporting the postdoctoral scholar workforce (Ålund et al., 2020), few studies have delved into postdoctoral scholars’ views on what would improve their belonging experiences in the workplace. The purpose of this study was to learn more about postdoctoral scholars’ experiences of belonging in the workplace in their own words. Design/methodology/approach The authors investigated postdoctoral scholars’ experiences with belonging through structured interviews and asked participants (n = 30 postdoctoral scholars working in the USA) how their sense of belonging could be increased in their workplace. Using an ecological model as a lens, the authors organize findings at policy, institutional and office/lab unit levels. Findings Postdoctoral scholars identified changes that could be made to increase their sense of belonging in the workplace, invoking a call to action within institutions of higher education and the broader research enterprise. Originality/value While previous research has found significant structural barriers to postdoctoral scholars’ sense of belonging, the research team specifically asked postdoctoral scholars to explain what would increase their sense of belonging.

Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral EducationVol. 17(2)
University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.