Implementation in Mathematics Education: Fidelity to Implementation Design and Fidelity to Innovation Theory

Abstract The concept of fidelity is important to the implementation of mathematics education innovations. However, viewing fidelity as only adherence to protocols and planned activities may mean that the importance of underpinning causal mechanisms or innovation theory are not attended to fully. To expand and clarify the meaning of fidelity, I consider how the constructs of fidelity and theory are used in implementation methodology, including in mathematics education implementation studies. Alongside consideration of fidelity to implementation design as adherence to planned activity, I propose that fidelity to innovation theory is also important. The construct of fidelity to innovation theory supports assessing whether adaptations in implementation are acceptable or positive. I illustrate how these complementary constructs are applicable depending on the innovation theory, the implementation path characteristics, the fidelity focus, the generative instance, and the actor and activity. The impact sheet to this article is available online at 10.6084/m9.figshare.28722908.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/26670127-bja10026
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation in Mathematics Education: Fidelity to Implementation Design and Fidelity to Innovation Theory

Mark Boylan
3 citations
Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education
Education and Critical Thinking Development
26.78
article

Implementation in Mathematics Education: Fidelity to Implementation Design and Fidelity to Innovation Theory

Mark Boylan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The concept of fidelity is important to the implementation of mathematics education innovations. However, viewing fidelity as only adherence to protocols and planned activities may mean that the importance of underpinning causal mechanisms or innovation theory are not attended to fully. To expand and clarify the meaning of fidelity, I consider how the constructs of fidelity and theory are used in implementation methodology, including in mathematics education implementation studies. Alongside consideration of fidelity to implementation design as adherence to planned activity, I propose that fidelity to innovation theory is also important. The construct of fidelity to innovation theory supports assessing whether adaptations in implementation are acceptable or positive. I illustrate how these complementary constructs are applicable depending on the innovation theory, the implementation path characteristics, the fidelity focus, the generative instance, and the actor and activity. The impact sheet to this article is available online at 10.6084/m9.figshare.28722908.

Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics EducationVol. 5(1)
Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
26.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Implementation in Mathematics Education: Fidelity to Implementation Design and Fidelity to Innovation Theory — Mark Boylan · Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS