The Persistence of Global Workplace Gender Inequality: What Does a Wicked Problems Framework Bring to HRM Research and Practice?

ABSTRACT The ongoing failure to resolve gender equality in workplaces emphasises the urgent need to consider new paradigms for understanding and resolving this worldwide issue. In this provocation paper, we argue that problematising workplace gender inequality using the paradigm of a wicked problem has significant implications for designing future HRM research and practice. After mapping the many factors and examples of outcomes linked to continued gender inequality, we critique the state of current research by applying the three dimensions of wicked problems thinking: complexity, divergence and uncertainty. Using numerous examples of HRM issues, we identify six implications for future HRM research. Implications include that gender inequality be investigated as many related problems; the trade‐offs between complexity and over‐simplification in research designs; variations in the usefulness of research findings to impacted stakeholders and more efforts towards engaged scholarship with its features of bottom‐up research and greater interdisciplinary collaboration. Turning to HRM practices, we identify how wicked problems thinking highlights how HRM practitioners also need to fully embrace the complexity of gender inequality, both causes and solutions. This demands the use of research methods that are collaborative and stakeholder‐focused, accepting the utility of partial solutions; and recognising the unintended positive and negative consequences that often occur from HRM interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.70017
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Persistence of Global Workplace Gender Inequality: What Does a Wicked Problems Framework Bring to HRM Research and Practice?

Katherine R. O’Brien, Brian Head, Margaret E. Crane, Victor J. Callan et al.
1 links
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

The Persistence of Global Workplace Gender Inequality: What Does a Wicked Problems Framework Bring to HRM Research and Practice?

Katherine R. O’Brien, Brian Head, Margaret E. Crane, Victor J. Callan, Terrance W. Fitzsimmons
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The ongoing failure to resolve gender equality in workplaces emphasises the urgent need to consider new paradigms for understanding and resolving this worldwide issue. In this provocation paper, we argue that problematising workplace gender inequality using the paradigm of a wicked problem has significant implications for designing future HRM research and practice. After mapping the many factors and examples of outcomes linked to continued gender inequality, we critique the state of current research by applying the three dimensions of wicked problems thinking: complexity, divergence and uncertainty. Using numerous examples of HRM issues, we identify six implications for future HRM research. Implications include that gender inequality be investigated as many related problems; the trade‐offs between complexity and over‐simplification in research designs; variations in the usefulness of research findings to impacted stakeholders and more efforts towards engaged scholarship with its features of bottom‐up research and greater interdisciplinary collaboration. Turning to HRM practices, we identify how wicked problems thinking highlights how HRM practitioners also need to fully embrace the complexity of gender inequality, both causes and solutions. This demands the use of research methods that are collaborative and stakeholder‐focused, accepting the utility of partial solutions; and recognising the unintended positive and negative consequences that often occur from HRM interventions.

Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesVol. 63(3)
The University of Queensland (AU)
University of Queensland
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.