Development of Priority Outcome Domains for Community Mental Health Research via Consensus Among Multiple Stakeholders: Online Delphi Study in Japan

Several core outcome sets (COS) have been developed in the field of mental health; however, the specific outcome domains that should be prioritised in community mental health research remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the key outcome domains for community mental health research in Japan, as determined by multiple stakeholders. First, a comprehensive list of outcome domains was compiled by scoping reviews, focus group interviews, and web-based questionnaire surveys. This was followed by two rounds of preliminary surveys with multiple stakeholders. Finally, three rounds of a web-based Delphi survey were conducted to determine the most important outcome domains of community mental health research in Japan. A total of 96 outcome domains were evaluated by 297 participants, with a response rate of 93.6%. This study identified 24 outcome domains that are essential for community mental health research in Japan. These 24 domains, which reached a consensus, included aspects related to comprehensive symptom assessment and personal recovery. Given that community care serves patients with diverse illnesses, identifying outcome domains that are broadly applicable across different community care settings rather than being limited to specific conditions is critical for future research. The study also highlights differences in perspectives among stakeholders regarding the importance of various outcomes. Despite these differences, several outcome domains have been recognised as being significantly important in the overall consensus. Trial Registration: University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000044680.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.70049
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of Priority Outcome Domains for Community Mental Health Research via Consensus Among Multiple Stakeholders: Online Delphi Study in Japan

Takayuki Kawaguchi, Takuma Shiozawa, Chiyo Fujii, Makiko Abe et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Delphi Technique in Research
8.40
article

Development of Priority Outcome Domains for Community Mental Health Research via Consensus Among Multiple Stakeholders: Online Delphi Study in Japan

Takayuki Kawaguchi, Takuma Shiozawa, Chiyo Fujii, Makiko Abe, Momoka Igarashi, Naonori Yasuma, Makoto Ogawa, Sosei Yamaguchi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Several core outcome sets (COS) have been developed in the field of mental health; however, the specific outcome domains that should be prioritised in community mental health research remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the key outcome domains for community mental health research in Japan, as determined by multiple stakeholders. First, a comprehensive list of outcome domains was compiled by scoping reviews, focus group interviews, and web-based questionnaire surveys. This was followed by two rounds of preliminary surveys with multiple stakeholders. Finally, three rounds of a web-based Delphi survey were conducted to determine the most important outcome domains of community mental health research in Japan. A total of 96 outcome domains were evaluated by 297 participants, with a response rate of 93.6%. This study identified 24 outcome domains that are essential for community mental health research in Japan. These 24 domains, which reached a consensus, included aspects related to comprehensive symptom assessment and personal recovery. Given that community care serves patients with diverse illnesses, identifying outcome domains that are broadly applicable across different community care settings rather than being limited to specific conditions is critical for future research. The study also highlights differences in perspectives among stakeholders regarding the importance of various outcomes. Despite these differences, several outcome domains have been recognised as being significantly important in the overall consensus. Trial Registration: University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000044680.

International Journal of Mental Health NursingVol. 34(3)
National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP), National Institute of Mental Health (JP)
National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Delphi Technique in Research
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.