Worse Places for Gods: Does Latitudinal Variability Loosen Religiosity?

This multi-level study explores whether greater variability in day length, temperatures, and daily precipitation at higher latitudes has a potential impact on religiosity. Religiosity is measured as the importance of religion experienced by 915,437 inhabitants of 159 countries from 2010 to 2015. Our results show that latitudinal variability is incompatible with personal religiosity, and that this ecological link is mediated by cultural tightness versus looseness rather than parasite stress and national wealth. Geographical analyses add that personal religiosity increases from the North Pole toward the equator, decreases from the equator toward the South Pole, and varies negligibly from east to west. The generalizability of the observed ecology and geography of personal religiosity is demonstrated by replicating the results on 682,405 inhabitants of 147 countries from 2016 to 2021. These findings can be understood as system-theoretical connections between external system variability (stronger latitudinal variability) and internal system flexibility (weaker personal religiosity).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for the Psychology of Religion
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2025.2505291
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Worse Places for Gods: Does Latitudinal Variability Loosen Religiosity?

Evert Van de Vliert, İrem Uz, Mohsen Joshanloo
International Journal for the Psychology of Religion
Cultural Differences and Values
article

Worse Places for Gods: Does Latitudinal Variability Loosen Religiosity?

Evert Van de Vliert, İrem Uz, Mohsen Joshanloo
article en

Abstract

This multi-level study explores whether greater variability in day length, temperatures, and daily precipitation at higher latitudes has a potential impact on religiosity. Religiosity is measured as the importance of religion experienced by 915,437 inhabitants of 159 countries from 2010 to 2015. Our results show that latitudinal variability is incompatible with personal religiosity, and that this ecological link is mediated by cultural tightness versus looseness rather than parasite stress and national wealth. Geographical analyses add that personal religiosity increases from the North Pole toward the equator, decreases from the equator toward the South Pole, and varies negligibly from east to west. The generalizability of the observed ecology and geography of personal religiosity is demonstrated by replicating the results on 682,405 inhabitants of 147 countries from 2016 to 2021. These findings can be understood as system-theoretical connections between external system variability (stronger latitudinal variability) and internal system flexibility (weaker personal religiosity).

International Journal for the Psychology of ReligionVol. 35(4)
University of Groningen (NL), Keimyung University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.