Self-Esteem and Technological Unemployment: Should We Halt AI to Protect Meaningful Work?

Abstract Should we insulate humanity from AI development in an effort to preserve people’s ability to form self-esteem and find meaning in their occupations? In this article, we take this possibility seriously and argue that technological insulation would ultimately fail in its aim. In doing so, we will consider two different scenarios: one in which we only halt the deployment of technology that would lead to our replacement as workers, and a second one in which we collectively deliberate to halt technological development as a whole. The former, we argue, fails to preserve our ability to form self-esteem, as we become aware that our role is contingent on a policy that artificially preserves our status as contributing members of our communities. The latter seems unfeasible and overly demanding considering the expected benefits of AI. We propose instead the life of play and the life of excellence in the context of collaborative work with machines as alternative sources of self-esteem to the life of work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-025-06007-8
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-Esteem and Technological Unemployment: Should We Halt AI to Protect Meaningful Work?

Carissa Véliz, Carlo Ludovico Cordasco
6 citations
Journal of Business Ethics
Employment and Welfare Studies
16.89
article

Self-Esteem and Technological Unemployment: Should We Halt AI to Protect Meaningful Work?

Carissa Véliz, Carlo Ludovico Cordasco
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Should we insulate humanity from AI development in an effort to preserve people’s ability to form self-esteem and find meaning in their occupations? In this article, we take this possibility seriously and argue that technological insulation would ultimately fail in its aim. In doing so, we will consider two different scenarios: one in which we only halt the deployment of technology that would lead to our replacement as workers, and a second one in which we collectively deliberate to halt technological development as a whole. The former, we argue, fails to preserve our ability to form self-esteem, as we become aware that our role is contingent on a policy that artificially preserves our status as contributing members of our communities. The latter seems unfeasible and overly demanding considering the expected benefits of AI. We propose instead the life of play and the life of excellence in the context of collaborative work with machines as alternative sources of self-esteem to the life of work.

Journal of Business EthicsVol. 202(1)
University of Manchester (GB), Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Employment and Welfare Studies
16.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.