Beyond quotas: how ESG disclosure and critical mass of female directors shape firm value in France

Purpose We investigate whether environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure and board gender diversity (BGD) affect the firm value for a sample of French non-financial listed firms during the concurrent enactment of French CSR and BGD quota laws. Specifically, we investigate whether ESG disclosure is positively associated with firm value, examine the impact of BGD on firm value, and explore whether reaching a critical mass of female directors (three or more) further enhances firm value. Design/methodology/approach Drawing upon agency theory, resource dependence theory, and critical mass theory, we develop our study hypotheses. We apply Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) multivariate linear models to 900 observations during the period 2011 to 2019 to reach empirical findings while addressing endogeneity concerns. Findings Our findings indicate that ESG score positively influences the firm value (Tobin’s Q), whereas BGD has a negative impact. Moreover, BGD positively affects the firm value when the number of women directors reaches a threshold of five, supporting the critical mass theory perspective. Research limitations/implications Our study focuses solely on France, limiting generalizability due to its unique regulatory environment, yet emphasizing the importance of considering diverse regulatory contexts in future research. Practical implications The study offers insights for corporate management to address stakeholders’ growing demands to disseminate a greater volume of ESG information, comply with women’s quota systems, and appoint experienced and talented female directors to ensure effective governance, rather than symbolically increase female representation in boardrooms. Social implications The study informs regulators and policymakers on promoting ESG disclosure practices and establishing guidelines for achieving an optimal number of qualified women directors to maximize governance effectiveness. Originality/value The study enhances stakeholders' understanding of how ESG disclosure and BGD influence firm market value, with a specific focus on the implications of the Copé-Zimmermann law and French CSR regulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Accounting Research
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-02-2025-0048
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond quotas: how ESG disclosure and critical mass of female directors shape firm value in France

Mostafa Kamal Hassan, Fathia Elleuch Lahyani, Khaldoon Albitar
2 citations
Journal of Applied Accounting Research
Corporate Finance and Governance
7.82
article

Beyond quotas: how ESG disclosure and critical mass of female directors shape firm value in France

Mostafa Kamal Hassan, Fathia Elleuch Lahyani, Khaldoon Albitar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose We investigate whether environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure and board gender diversity (BGD) affect the firm value for a sample of French non-financial listed firms during the concurrent enactment of French CSR and BGD quota laws. Specifically, we investigate whether ESG disclosure is positively associated with firm value, examine the impact of BGD on firm value, and explore whether reaching a critical mass of female directors (three or more) further enhances firm value. Design/methodology/approach Drawing upon agency theory, resource dependence theory, and critical mass theory, we develop our study hypotheses. We apply Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) multivariate linear models to 900 observations during the period 2011 to 2019 to reach empirical findings while addressing endogeneity concerns. Findings Our findings indicate that ESG score positively influences the firm value (Tobin’s Q), whereas BGD has a negative impact. Moreover, BGD positively affects the firm value when the number of women directors reaches a threshold of five, supporting the critical mass theory perspective. Research limitations/implications Our study focuses solely on France, limiting generalizability due to its unique regulatory environment, yet emphasizing the importance of considering diverse regulatory contexts in future research. Practical implications The study offers insights for corporate management to address stakeholders’ growing demands to disseminate a greater volume of ESG information, comply with women’s quota systems, and appoint experienced and talented female directors to ensure effective governance, rather than symbolically increase female representation in boardrooms. Social implications The study informs regulators and policymakers on promoting ESG disclosure practices and establishing guidelines for achieving an optimal number of qualified women directors to maximize governance effectiveness. Originality/value The study enhances stakeholders' understanding of how ESG disclosure and BGD influence firm market value, with a specific focus on the implications of the Copé-Zimmermann law and French CSR regulations.

Journal of Applied Accounting ResearchVol. 27(1)
Qatar University (QA), Adam Smith Institute (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Corporate Finance and Governance
7.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.