Applications of Analytics in Disease Prediction Types

Predictive analytics has immense potential in disease type classifications. The key is to identify the set of genetic and clinical variables that can serve as predictors for disease classification purposes. However, the predictive and the prescriptive models both suffer from high dimensionality of these predictors. Therefore, it becomes important to identify a subset of these genetic and clinical variables that can be used for disease type predictions. Earlier studies have identified a subset of 978 landmark genes that can infer the expression values of the remaining gene in the human genome with ~81% accuracy. This study focuses on understanding if there is any significant difference in the characteristics of the landmark and non-landmark genes. Several experiments were performed on diseased tissues that were classified across race, ethnicity, and disease types with an objective to identify the number of differentially expressed genes within the landmark and non-landmark gene sets. Statistically, there was no conclusive evidence to support the hypothesis that there is a significant difference in the number of differentially expressed genes across the landmark and non-landmark gene sets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54116/jbdai.v3i1.49
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applications of Analytics in Disease Prediction Types

Abhishek Tripathi, Satish Srinivasan, Chung-Hung Tsai
Journal of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Applications of Analytics in Disease Prediction Types

Abhishek Tripathi, Satish Srinivasan, Chung-Hung Tsai
article en

Abstract

Predictive analytics has immense potential in disease type classifications. The key is to identify the set of genetic and clinical variables that can serve as predictors for disease classification purposes. However, the predictive and the prescriptive models both suffer from high dimensionality of these predictors. Therefore, it becomes important to identify a subset of these genetic and clinical variables that can be used for disease type predictions. Earlier studies have identified a subset of 978 landmark genes that can infer the expression values of the remaining gene in the human genome with ~81% accuracy. This study focuses on understanding if there is any significant difference in the characteristics of the landmark and non-landmark genes. Several experiments were performed on diseased tissues that were classified across race, ethnicity, and disease types with an objective to identify the number of differentially expressed genes within the landmark and non-landmark gene sets. Statistically, there was no conclusive evidence to support the hypothesis that there is a significant difference in the number of differentially expressed genes across the landmark and non-landmark gene sets.

Journal of Big Data and Artificial IntelligenceVol. 3(1)
Pennsylvania State University (US), William Penn University (US), The College of New Jersey (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.