Understanding Adolescent Psychological Distress: The Impact of Rejection Sensitivity and Rumination

Background: Adolescents are particularly vulnerable to psychological distress due to heightened emotional reactivity and developmental transitions. While rejection sensitivity and rumination have been independently linked to adverse emotional outcomes, their combined effect on psychological distress remains underexplored, especially in non-Western populations. Objective: This study aimed to examine the interrelationship among rejection sensitivity, rumination, and psychological distress in adolescents, and to assess the predictive role of rejection sensitivity on rumination and both variables on psychological distress. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted involving 518 adolescents (ages 14–18) from government and private schools in Rawalpindi and Islamabad, selected using purposive sampling. Inclusion criteria included current enrollment in school and age between 14 and 18 years; individuals outside this age range or with incomplete data were excluded. Participants completed the Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire, the Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire (rumination subscale), and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee, and all procedures complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. Data were analyzed using SPSS v27. Correlation and multiple regression analyses were employed to examine associations and predictive relationships among variables. Results: Rejection sensitivity showed a significant positive correlation with rumination (r = 0.28, p < .01) and psychological distress (r = 0.21, p < .01). Rumination also correlated positively with psychological distress (r = 0.13, p < .05). Regression analysis revealed that rejection sensitivity significantly predicted rumination (β = 0.108, p = .003), explaining 6% of its variance. Combined, rejection sensitivity and rumination accounted for 29% of the variance in psychological distress (R² = 0.29, p < .001), with rumination having a stronger predictive effect (β = 0.502, p < .001). Male adolescents reported significantly higher rumination levels than females (p < .001). Conclusion: Rejection sensitivity and rumination are significant, interrelated psychological mechanisms contributing to adolescent psychological distress. These findings highlight the importance of early identification and cognitive-emotional intervention strategies to mitigate distress and promote mental health in adolescents

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Wellness and Community Research
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61919/ncpbrn54
Primary Topic
Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Adolescent Psychological Distress: The Impact of Rejection Sensitivity and Rumination

Arooj Ashraf, Mishal Fatima, Rahma Sohail, Sana Israr
Journal of Health Wellness and Community Research
Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
article

Understanding Adolescent Psychological Distress: The Impact of Rejection Sensitivity and Rumination

Arooj Ashraf, Mishal Fatima, Rahma Sohail, Sana Israr
article en

Abstract

Background: Adolescents are particularly vulnerable to psychological distress due to heightened emotional reactivity and developmental transitions. While rejection sensitivity and rumination have been independently linked to adverse emotional outcomes, their combined effect on psychological distress remains underexplored, especially in non-Western populations. Objective: This study aimed to examine the interrelationship among rejection sensitivity, rumination, and psychological distress in adolescents, and to assess the predictive role of rejection sensitivity on rumination and both variables on psychological distress. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted involving 518 adolescents (ages 14–18) from government and private schools in Rawalpindi and Islamabad, selected using purposive sampling. Inclusion criteria included current enrollment in school and age between 14 and 18 years; individuals outside this age range or with incomplete data were excluded. Participants completed the Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire, the Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire (rumination subscale), and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee, and all procedures complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. Data were analyzed using SPSS v27. Correlation and multiple regression analyses were employed to examine associations and predictive relationships among variables. Results: Rejection sensitivity showed a significant positive correlation with rumination (r = 0.28, p < .01) and psychological distress (r = 0.21, p < .01). Rumination also correlated positively with psychological distress (r = 0.13, p < .05). Regression analysis revealed that rejection sensitivity significantly predicted rumination (β = 0.108, p = .003), explaining 6% of its variance. Combined, rejection sensitivity and rumination accounted for 29% of the variance in psychological distress (R² = 0.29, p < .001), with rumination having a stronger predictive effect (β = 0.502, p < .001). Male adolescents reported significantly higher rumination levels than females (p < .001). Conclusion: Rejection sensitivity and rumination are significant, interrelated psychological mechanisms contributing to adolescent psychological distress. These findings highlight the importance of early identification and cognitive-emotional intervention strategies to mitigate distress and promote mental health in adolescents

Journal of Health Wellness and Community Research
Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.