AI-Augmented Netnography: Ethical and Methodological Frameworks for Responsible Digital Research

The increasing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in social sciences research is reshaping qualitative methodologies, particularly in those studies that employ the netnography method. Although AI provides improved data processing abilities, it also introduces ethical and methodological concerns about privacy, transparency, authenticity, and possible bias. This paper proposes ethical and methodological frameworks for AI-augmented netnography that prioritize responsible AI use without compromising the interpretive depth and cultural sensitivity foundational to traditional netnography. The frameworks address the complexities of informed consent, data minimization, bias mitigation, and accountability, providing a structured approach to balancing AI’s efficiency with human-led analysis. Using a case study of online activism, this research illustrates the frameworks’ practical application across diverse digital platforms, such as Twitter and Instagram. By combining AI-driven sentiment and pattern recognition with human interpretive oversight, the study captures cultural nuances essential to understanding online social movements. This dual approach highlights AI-augmented netnography’s potential to deliver rigorous, ethically grounded insights into digital communities, promoting more nuanced and inclusive research outcomes. The study contributes to the evolving landscape of digital research by offering actionable, ethically robust frameworks applicable to a broad spectrum of qualitative studies, emphasizing socially responsible research practices in the digital age.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251338910
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Augmented Netnography: Ethical and Methodological Frameworks for Responsible Digital Research

Chee Wei Cheah
5 citations
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
11.83
article

AI-Augmented Netnography: Ethical and Methodological Frameworks for Responsible Digital Research

Chee Wei Cheah
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The increasing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in social sciences research is reshaping qualitative methodologies, particularly in those studies that employ the netnography method. Although AI provides improved data processing abilities, it also introduces ethical and methodological concerns about privacy, transparency, authenticity, and possible bias. This paper proposes ethical and methodological frameworks for AI-augmented netnography that prioritize responsible AI use without compromising the interpretive depth and cultural sensitivity foundational to traditional netnography. The frameworks address the complexities of informed consent, data minimization, bias mitigation, and accountability, providing a structured approach to balancing AI’s efficiency with human-led analysis. Using a case study of online activism, this research illustrates the frameworks’ practical application across diverse digital platforms, such as Twitter and Instagram. By combining AI-driven sentiment and pattern recognition with human interpretive oversight, the study captures cultural nuances essential to understanding online social movements. This dual approach highlights AI-augmented netnography’s potential to deliver rigorous, ethically grounded insights into digital communities, promoting more nuanced and inclusive research outcomes. The study contributes to the evolving landscape of digital research by offering actionable, ethically robust frameworks applicable to a broad spectrum of qualitative studies, emphasizing socially responsible research practices in the digital age.

International Journal of Qualitative MethodsVol. 24
Shenzhen Technology University (CN), Shenzhen MSU-BIT University
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
11.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.