Monitoring privilege for health equity: building consensus on indicators to monitor socioeconomic advantage through a modified Delphi survey

The World Health Organization's Commission on Social Determinants of Health highlighted the need to measure and monitor the inequitable distribution of power, money, and resources across society. Efforts to monitor health inequity focus on disadvantage rather than advantage or privilege, and on proximal health outcomes rather than distal social and structural determinants of health. This study aimed to identify a comprehensive set of key indicators to measure and monitor socioeconomic advantage. Following a literature review to establish an initial set of indicators (n = 79), we used a three-round, online Delphi survey to build consensus among a panel of participants with diverse disciplinary backgrounds and with expertise related to socioeconomic inequity. Participants rated indicators for relevance to the concept of socioeconomic advantage using a seven-point Likert scale and ranked priority indicators among selected indicator categories. Thirty-one, 21 and 15 experts-predominantly from Australia- participated in the first, second and third round, respectively. Sixty-four of 76 indicators reached consensus, including all indicators within the 'Wealth' and 'Income/wealth inequality' categories. Priority rankings of economic indicators were clear: gross income and disposable income were the highest ranked income indicators; net wealth was the highest ranked wealth indicator. Ranking of 'Connections and signalling indicators' was less distinct; however, elite secondary schooling, and attendance at exclusive events received the highest mean ranks. Monitoring of these socioeconomic advantage indicators is crucial for identifying whether policy and governance is ultimately shifting the dial on equitably distributing resources for improving health equity outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118193
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring privilege for health equity: building consensus on indicators to monitor socioeconomic advantage through a modified Delphi survey

Sharon Friel, Amy Carrad, Melanie Pescud, Patrick John Harris et al.
2 citations
Social Science & Medicine
Delphi Technique in Research
8.40
article

Monitoring privilege for health equity: building consensus on indicators to monitor socioeconomic advantage through a modified Delphi survey

Sharon Friel, Amy Carrad, Melanie Pescud, Patrick John Harris, Ashley Schram, Fran Baum, Lucie Rychetnik, Steven E. Allender, Belinda Townsend
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The World Health Organization's Commission on Social Determinants of Health highlighted the need to measure and monitor the inequitable distribution of power, money, and resources across society. Efforts to monitor health inequity focus on disadvantage rather than advantage or privilege, and on proximal health outcomes rather than distal social and structural determinants of health. This study aimed to identify a comprehensive set of key indicators to measure and monitor socioeconomic advantage. Following a literature review to establish an initial set of indicators (n = 79), we used a three-round, online Delphi survey to build consensus among a panel of participants with diverse disciplinary backgrounds and with expertise related to socioeconomic inequity. Participants rated indicators for relevance to the concept of socioeconomic advantage using a seven-point Likert scale and ranked priority indicators among selected indicator categories. Thirty-one, 21 and 15 experts-predominantly from Australia- participated in the first, second and third round, respectively. Sixty-four of 76 indicators reached consensus, including all indicators within the 'Wealth' and 'Income/wealth inequality' categories. Priority rankings of economic indicators were clear: gross income and disposable income were the highest ranked income indicators; net wealth was the highest ranked wealth indicator. Ranking of 'Connections and signalling indicators' was less distinct; however, elite secondary schooling, and attendance at exclusive events received the highest mean ranks. Monitoring of these socioeconomic advantage indicators is crucial for identifying whether policy and governance is ultimately shifting the dial on equitably distributing resources for improving health equity outcomes.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 379
Australian National University (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), Deakin University (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Liverpool Hospital (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Delphi Technique in Research
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.