The Diffusion Dilemma in Innovation: Slow and Unequal Uptake of Lowemission Inhalers in the USA

This study examines the adoption of low-emission Inhalers versus traditional metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) in the U.S., using data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) from 2010 to 2021. Despite the environmental benefits of low-emission inhalers, their adoption has been slow and marked by socio-economic and racial disparities. Analysis reveals that patients below the poverty line are significantly less likely to use low-emission inhalers, as are patients who are uninsured, and patients who self-identify as Black—with all these gaps widening over time. The findings highlight the need for targeted policy interventions to address these disparities and enhance equitable access to environmentally friendly healthcare innovation. Future research should investigate pricing dynamics, out-of-pocket expenditures, and causal mechanisms behind these disparities. This study underscores the challenge of aligning environmental goals with health equity in healthcare innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Economics Business and Management Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51505/ijebmr.2025.9409
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Diffusion Dilemma in Innovation: Slow and Unequal Uptake of Lowemission Inhalers in the USA

Jeremy A. Greene, Jeromie Ballreich, Mariana P. Socal, Gerard F. Anderson et al.
International Journal of Economics Business and Management Research
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

The Diffusion Dilemma in Innovation: Slow and Unequal Uptake of Lowemission Inhalers in the USA

Jeremy A. Greene, Jeromie Ballreich, Mariana P. Socal, Gerard F. Anderson, Antonio J. Trujillo, Kim Kwanghyun
article en

Abstract

This study examines the adoption of low-emission Inhalers versus traditional metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) in the U.S., using data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) from 2010 to 2021. Despite the environmental benefits of low-emission inhalers, their adoption has been slow and marked by socio-economic and racial disparities. Analysis reveals that patients below the poverty line are significantly less likely to use low-emission inhalers, as are patients who are uninsured, and patients who self-identify as Black—with all these gaps widening over time. The findings highlight the need for targeted policy interventions to address these disparities and enhance equitable access to environmentally friendly healthcare innovation. Future research should investigate pricing dynamics, out-of-pocket expenditures, and causal mechanisms behind these disparities. This study underscores the challenge of aligning environmental goals with health equity in healthcare innovation.

International Journal of Economics Business and Management ResearchVol. 09(04)
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.