Trade lobbying works (for big firms): Evidence from the China trade war

Abstract Is trade lobbying effective and does its effectiveness vary across firms? Using requests for relief from China trade war tariffs, we demonstrate that lobbying for specific trade policies contributed to securing those exact policies, an elusive target in the long-running trade lobbying literature. We further argue that lobbying should be most impactful for big companies because policymakers prioritize jobs and growth when allocating a limited number of policy favors. In line with this, we find that lobbying for tariff reductions by large firms was hugely more effective than for small firms, though with one major exception: requests from firms that owned foreign subsidiaries in China were overwhelmingly rejected. Large firms are powerful, especially when their interests align with policymakers’ economic policy objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business and Politics
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2025.13
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade lobbying works (for big firms): Evidence from the China trade war

Iain Osgood, Jieun Lee, Ayse Eldes
4 citations
Business and Politics
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
8.91
article

Trade lobbying works (for big firms): Evidence from the China trade war

Iain Osgood, Jieun Lee, Ayse Eldes
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Is trade lobbying effective and does its effectiveness vary across firms? Using requests for relief from China trade war tariffs, we demonstrate that lobbying for specific trade policies contributed to securing those exact policies, an elusive target in the long-running trade lobbying literature. We further argue that lobbying should be most impactful for big companies because policymakers prioritize jobs and growth when allocating a limited number of policy favors. In line with this, we find that lobbying for tariff reductions by large firms was hugely more effective than for small firms, though with one major exception: requests from firms that owned foreign subsidiaries in China were overwhelmingly rejected. Large firms are powerful, especially when their interests align with policymakers’ economic policy objectives.

Business and Politics
Princeton University (US), University of Michigan (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
University of Cambridge
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
8.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trade lobbying works (for big firms): Evidence from the China trade war — Iain Osgood, Jieun Lee, et al. · Business and Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS