DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AND SUSTAINABILITY: MAPPING RESEARCH GAPS AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The intersection of digital transformation and sustainability is increasingly recognized as a critical area of research, but the academic literature remains fragmented and lacks integrative frameworks. A review of previous studies shows that while digital technologies such as AI, IoT and big data offer significant opportunities to advance sustainability goals, research has mainly focused on a few sectors and regions, with persistent gaps in standardized impact metrics, theoretical integration and attention to the environmental footprint of digital solutions. To address these limitations, this article applies Systematic Network Literature Analysis, combining systematic literature review with advanced bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer. Our process began with 357 articles identified in the Web of Science database using the keywords “digital transformation” and “sustainability”; after applying category and document-type filters, 68 articles published between 2016 and 2025 were selected for in-depth analysis. Our analysis empirically shows that, in addition to the central concepts of “digital transformation” and “sustainability,” the literature is grouped around subtopics from the fields of business and management: Technological Enablers (e.g., big data, industry 4.0), Innovation and Business Models (e.g., business model innovation), Performance and Impact (e.g., performance, challenges) and Sustainability Dimensions (e.g., environmental sustainability, circular economy). Co-occurrence and citation analyses not only confirm known sectoral and geographical imbalances but also provide new insights by quantifying the density and interconnections of key concepts and highlighting underexplored sectors such as healthcare, agriculture and education. This structured mapping advances the field by offering a visualized knowledge map and revealing actionable research gaps and emerging trends.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CACTUS
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24818/cts/7/2025/1.07
Citations
1
Primary Topic
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AND SUSTAINABILITY: MAPPING RESEARCH GAPS AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Mădălina-Lavinia Ţală, Olimpia State, Daniela-Elena Mocanu, Diana-Maria Preda
1 citations
CACTUS
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
2.76
article

DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AND SUSTAINABILITY: MAPPING RESEARCH GAPS AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Mădălina-Lavinia Ţală, Olimpia State, Daniela-Elena Mocanu, Diana-Maria Preda
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The intersection of digital transformation and sustainability is increasingly recognized as a critical area of research, but the academic literature remains fragmented and lacks integrative frameworks. A review of previous studies shows that while digital technologies such as AI, IoT and big data offer significant opportunities to advance sustainability goals, research has mainly focused on a few sectors and regions, with persistent gaps in standardized impact metrics, theoretical integration and attention to the environmental footprint of digital solutions. To address these limitations, this article applies Systematic Network Literature Analysis, combining systematic literature review with advanced bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer. Our process began with 357 articles identified in the Web of Science database using the keywords “digital transformation” and “sustainability”; after applying category and document-type filters, 68 articles published between 2016 and 2025 were selected for in-depth analysis. Our analysis empirically shows that, in addition to the central concepts of “digital transformation” and “sustainability,” the literature is grouped around subtopics from the fields of business and management: Technological Enablers (e.g., big data, industry 4.0), Innovation and Business Models (e.g., business model innovation), Performance and Impact (e.g., performance, challenges) and Sustainability Dimensions (e.g., environmental sustainability, circular economy). Co-occurrence and citation analyses not only confirm known sectoral and geographical imbalances but also provide new insights by quantifying the density and interconnections of key concepts and highlighting underexplored sectors such as healthcare, agriculture and education. This structured mapping advances the field by offering a visualized knowledge map and revealing actionable research gaps and emerging trends.

CACTUSVol. 7(1)
Bucharest University of Economic Studies (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.