Loading-related injuries of mechanically loaded broilers under field conditions

This publication is part of a large study whose objective was to assess animal welfare during 32 mechanical loadings of broilers. We here focus on animal health aspects and the influences of circumstances during mechanical loading. Broilers in two husbandry systems (HS) (mean number of fattening days: HS 2: 41.3 days; HS 3: 40.1 days) were assessed on-farm for loading-related injuries such as fractures, hematomas, and abrasions before and after mechanical loading. The influence of conveyor belt speed (fast vs. slow), container type (GP container vs. SmartStack container), HS, fattening method (FM), season, and sex on loading-related injuries was analyzed. The two HS were grouped according to the specifications of a retail trade label into three FM (HS 2: Standard and Standard Premium, HS 3: Premium), which differed, among other aspects, in genotype, stocking density, dark period, and access to a veranda. Hematomas on the wing (6.55%) were the most common type of injury followed by hematomas on the wing tip (6.17%), abrasions on the body (4.92%), abrasions on the wing tip (4.25%), severe wing injuries (1.13%), and hematomas on the wing proximal to the wing tip (0.38%). A reduction in injuries was achieved by a slow belt speed, the use of a SmartStack container, and loadings during spring and summer. Loading broilers of HS 3 compared with those of HS 2 led to a significantly lower risk of severe wing injuries, total abrasions, and wing tip abrasions. Broilers of the Standard Premium (P = 0.038) and Premium FM (P = <0.001) had a significantly lower risk of severe wing injuries than those of the Standard FM, demonstrating that not only the genotype, which is one of the major differences between HS 2 and 3, influences the injury rate. Other differences in FM, such as a longer dark period, a lower stocking density at housing, more enrichment, and access to a veranda should be considered as influencing factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poultry Science
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2025.105297
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Loading-related injuries of mechanically loaded broilers under field conditions

Martin Gotthart, Michael Erhard, Helen Louton, Alexandra Blaeske et al.
Poultry Science
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

Loading-related injuries of mechanically loaded broilers under field conditions

Martin Gotthart, Michael Erhard, Helen Louton, Alexandra Blaeske, Anne Werner, Paul J. Schmidt, Elke Rauch, Julia Unterholzner
article en

Abstract

This publication is part of a large study whose objective was to assess animal welfare during 32 mechanical loadings of broilers. We here focus on animal health aspects and the influences of circumstances during mechanical loading. Broilers in two husbandry systems (HS) (mean number of fattening days: HS 2: 41.3 days; HS 3: 40.1 days) were assessed on-farm for loading-related injuries such as fractures, hematomas, and abrasions before and after mechanical loading. The influence of conveyor belt speed (fast vs. slow), container type (GP container vs. SmartStack container), HS, fattening method (FM), season, and sex on loading-related injuries was analyzed. The two HS were grouped according to the specifications of a retail trade label into three FM (HS 2: Standard and Standard Premium, HS 3: Premium), which differed, among other aspects, in genotype, stocking density, dark period, and access to a veranda. Hematomas on the wing (6.55%) were the most common type of injury followed by hematomas on the wing tip (6.17%), abrasions on the body (4.92%), abrasions on the wing tip (4.25%), severe wing injuries (1.13%), and hematomas on the wing proximal to the wing tip (0.38%). A reduction in injuries was achieved by a slow belt speed, the use of a SmartStack container, and loadings during spring and summer. Loading broilers of HS 3 compared with those of HS 2 led to a significantly lower risk of severe wing injuries, total abrasions, and wing tip abrasions. Broilers of the Standard Premium (P = 0.038) and Premium FM (P = <0.001) had a significantly lower risk of severe wing injuries than those of the Standard FM, demonstrating that not only the genotype, which is one of the major differences between HS 2 and 3, influences the injury rate. Other differences in FM, such as a longer dark period, a lower stocking density at housing, more enrichment, and access to a veranda should be considered as influencing factors.

Poultry ScienceVol. 104(8)
Deutsches Forschungsnetz (DE), Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Department (IN), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft, Bundesamt für Landwirtschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.