Risk prediction in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma improves when combining baseline PET features with interim PET response

Accurate detection of patients at high risk of treatment failure following first-line immunochemotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is of paramount importance as patients might benefit from early treatment escalation. Recently, we introduced the International Metabolic Prognostic Index (IMPI) based on metabolic tumor volume (MTV), age and stage that outperformed the International Prognostic Index. However, radiomic features such as the maximum distance between the largest lesion and another lesion (Dmaxbulk) or the peak standardized uptake value (SUVpeak) along with early treatment response at interim positron emission tomography (iPET) based on ΔSUVmax may have additional predictive value. We tested different models for risk prediction aiming to develop a dynamic risk tool. All patients within the PETRA database with newly diagnosed DLBCL treated with R-CHOP, who had available clinical data, baseline PET and iPET scans were included. The optimal transformation of Dmaxbulk, SUVpeak and ΔSUVmax was determined by choosing the best fitting Cox regression model with lowest Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), while the cross-validated c-index was obtained as a measure for discrimination. Risk models were developed using clinical, baseline PET and iPET data. The best risk model was compared to the IMPI and our subsequent ClinicalPET model. A total of 1,014 patients were included in the analyses. Best baseline model included age, MTV and Dmaxbulk (AIC 3208.89, c-index 0.70). Adding iPET response further improved outcome prediction (AIC 3140.36, c-index 0.74) with wider segregation of Kaplan-Meier curves and improved rates of correct risk classification, supporting the value of a dynamic risk assessment in DLBCL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Haematologica
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2024.287241
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk prediction in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma improves when combining baseline PET features with interim PET response

Christine Hanoun, Sándor Czibor, Martijn W. Heymans, G. Mikhaeel et al.
Haematologica
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Risk prediction in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma improves when combining baseline PET features with interim PET response

Christine Hanoun, Sándor Czibor, Martijn W. Heymans, G. Mikhaeel, Tamás Györke, Luca Ceriani, Lars Kurch, Ronald Boellaard, Jakoba J. Eertink, Sally F. Barrington, Josée M. Zijlstra, Pieternella J. Lugtenburg, Gerben J.C. Zwezerijnen, Sanne E. Wiegers, Andreas Hüttmann, Ulrich Dührsen, Emanuele Zucca, Annelies Bes
article en

Abstract

Accurate detection of patients at high risk of treatment failure following first-line immunochemotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is of paramount importance as patients might benefit from early treatment escalation. Recently, we introduced the International Metabolic Prognostic Index (IMPI) based on metabolic tumor volume (MTV), age and stage that outperformed the International Prognostic Index. However, radiomic features such as the maximum distance between the largest lesion and another lesion (Dmaxbulk) or the peak standardized uptake value (SUVpeak) along with early treatment response at interim positron emission tomography (iPET) based on ΔSUVmax may have additional predictive value. We tested different models for risk prediction aiming to develop a dynamic risk tool. All patients within the PETRA database with newly diagnosed DLBCL treated with R-CHOP, who had available clinical data, baseline PET and iPET scans were included. The optimal transformation of Dmaxbulk, SUVpeak and ΔSUVmax was determined by choosing the best fitting Cox regression model with lowest Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), while the cross-validated c-index was obtained as a measure for discrimination. Risk models were developed using clinical, baseline PET and iPET data. The best risk model was compared to the IMPI and our subsequent ClinicalPET model. A total of 1,014 patients were included in the analyses. Best baseline model included age, MTV and Dmaxbulk (AIC 3208.89, c-index 0.70). Adding iPET response further improved outcome prediction (AIC 3140.36, c-index 0.74) with wider segregation of Kaplan-Meier curves and improved rates of correct risk classification, supporting the value of a dynamic risk assessment in DLBCL.

HaematologicaVol. 110(10)
Semmelweis University (HU), Institute of Oncology Research (CH), Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin (DE), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), University Hospital Leipzig (DE), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL), Università della Svizzera italiana (CH), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, King's College London, Deutsche Krebshilfe, Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Centre For Medical Engineering, King’s College London
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.