Research on teachers' disciplinary power from 2000 to 2024: In-depth Analysis under the Three-dimensional Framework Model

To systematically review the research findings related to teachers' disciplinary power, this paper constructs a three-dimensional framework model covering educational stages, disciplinary methods, and teaching types. Using this as a tool, a comprehensive analysis is carried out on the core documents included in CNKI from 2000 to 2024. The research results show that the research process of teachers' disciplinary power can be divided into three stages. In the initial stage, the academic community mainly discussed the rationality and legitimacy of teachers' disciplinary power. In the middle stage, the research focus gradually shifted to the methods and measurement of teacher discipline. In the later stage, the research focus was on the disciplinary subjects and legislation. Further in-depth analysis from each dimension of the three-dimensional framework model reveals that, in the dimension of educational stages, research on disciplinary measures in higher education is relatively weak compared with the rich research results on disciplinary measures in primary education.

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Educational Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25236/fer.2025.080303
Primary Topic
Educational Reforms and Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on teachers' disciplinary power from 2000 to 2024: In-depth Analysis under the Three-dimensional Framework Model

Frontiers in Educational Research
Educational Reforms and Innovations
article

Research on teachers' disciplinary power from 2000 to 2024: In-depth Analysis under the Three-dimensional Framework Model

article en

Abstract

To systematically review the research findings related to teachers' disciplinary power, this paper constructs a three-dimensional framework model covering educational stages, disciplinary methods, and teaching types. Using this as a tool, a comprehensive analysis is carried out on the core documents included in CNKI from 2000 to 2024. The research results show that the research process of teachers' disciplinary power can be divided into three stages. In the initial stage, the academic community mainly discussed the rationality and legitimacy of teachers' disciplinary power. In the middle stage, the research focus gradually shifted to the methods and measurement of teacher discipline. In the later stage, the research focus was on the disciplinary subjects and legislation. Further in-depth analysis from each dimension of the three-dimensional framework model reveals that, in the dimension of educational stages, research on disciplinary measures in higher education is relatively weak compared with the rich research results on disciplinary measures in primary education.

Frontiers in Educational ResearchVol. 8(3)
Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Hubei University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Educational Reforms and Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.