High‐ and Low‐Protein Pea Genotypes: A Comparative Study of the Physicochemical, Functional, and Quality Properties of Protein Isolates

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives This study evaluated the effect of seed protein content on the composition, physicochemical, functional, and quality properties of pea protein isolates recovered through alkaline extraction/isoelectric precipitation. Samples were divided into three high‐protein lines (HPL), three low‐protein lines (LPL), and one control (medium protein). Findings Isolates derived from HPLs had higher protein (92.4%–94.5%) compared to LPLs (79.9%–88.7%) and the control (~92%). The protein content was significantly correlated to the legumin/vicilin ratio (1.0–1.8), surface charge (−38 to −23 mV), and surface tension (49–52.7 mN/m). No significant correlation was observed between protein content and functionality. Minor variation was observed for emulsifying (17.7–22.1 m 2 /g) and foaming (160%–215%) properties. LPLs presented higher amino acid score (0.83), and In Vitro protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (~0.72) than HPLs (~0.72 and ~0.64, respectively). Protein digestibility was in the range of ~87% for all lines. Conclusions Seed protein concentration impacted the pea protein isolates' proximate composition, quality, and physicochemical/surface properties. HPLs presented higher total protein content and LPLs presenting overall higher protein quality, whereas functionality did not differ significantly between HPLs versus LPLs. Significance and Novelty Our findings highlight the importance of sourcing and selecting pea lines tailored to specific applications, with a trade‐off between protein quantity versus quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cereal Chemistry
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10889
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Proteins in Food Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High‐ and Low‐Protein Pea Genotypes: A Comparative Study of the Physicochemical, Functional, and Quality Properties of Protein Isolates

Cassia Galves, Thomas D. Warkentin, James D. House, Michael T. Nickerson et al.
3 citations
Cereal Chemistry
Proteins in Food Systems
3.49
article

High‐ and Low‐Protein Pea Genotypes: A Comparative Study of the Physicochemical, Functional, and Quality Properties of Protein Isolates

Cassia Galves, Thomas D. Warkentin, James D. House, Michael T. Nickerson, Krishna Kishore Gali
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives This study evaluated the effect of seed protein content on the composition, physicochemical, functional, and quality properties of pea protein isolates recovered through alkaline extraction/isoelectric precipitation. Samples were divided into three high‐protein lines (HPL), three low‐protein lines (LPL), and one control (medium protein). Findings Isolates derived from HPLs had higher protein (92.4%–94.5%) compared to LPLs (79.9%–88.7%) and the control (~92%). The protein content was significantly correlated to the legumin/vicilin ratio (1.0–1.8), surface charge (−38 to −23 mV), and surface tension (49–52.7 mN/m). No significant correlation was observed between protein content and functionality. Minor variation was observed for emulsifying (17.7–22.1 m 2 /g) and foaming (160%–215%) properties. LPLs presented higher amino acid score (0.83), and In Vitro protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (~0.72) than HPLs (~0.72 and ~0.64, respectively). Protein digestibility was in the range of ~87% for all lines. Conclusions Seed protein concentration impacted the pea protein isolates' proximate composition, quality, and physicochemical/surface properties. HPLs presented higher total protein content and LPLs presenting overall higher protein quality, whereas functionality did not differ significantly between HPLs versus LPLs. Significance and Novelty Our findings highlight the importance of sourcing and selecting pea lines tailored to specific applications, with a trade‐off between protein quantity versus quality.

Cereal ChemistryVol. 102(4)
Research Manitoba (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA), University of Manitoba (CA)
Ministry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Proteins in Food Systems
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.