Assessment and cross-validation of calibration transferability between dried blood spot sampling devices for accurate quantification of phosphatidylethanol

Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a direct alcohol biomarker which is used in a variety of clinical and forensic contexts. Due to its limited stability in whole blood, PEth is routinely analysed using dried blood spots (DBS). There are many different commercially available sampling systems for DBS, but data on their comparability is scarce. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of PEth 16:0/18:1 and PEth 16:0/18:2 for three different DBS sampling systems: Whatman™ filter paper (903 Protein Saver Cards), Mitra<sup>®</sup> and Capitainer<sup>®</sup>B Vanadate. The transferability of calibration curves and their applicability across these devices should be assessed. The results showed that DBS of all devices could be prepared and analysed using the same procedure. Validation was successful for the devices. The accuracy of QCs was best if quantified using the matching DBS sampling device calibration curve (bias < 15 %). Higher, but still acceptable, bias values were observed when using a Whatman™ calibration curve to quantify PEth in DBS of the Capitainer<sup>®</sup>B Vanadate system and vice versa. Mitra<sup>®</sup> QCs should only be quantified using device-specific calibration curves, as in all other cases, accuracy exceeded the limit of 15 %. We recommend analysing samples using device-specific calibrations at all times, as determined PEth concentrations might be crucial for patients and should not be subjected to any avoidable uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-025-05897-x
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment and cross-validation of calibration transferability between dried blood spot sampling devices for accurate quantification of phosphatidylethanol

J. Hose, Hilke Andresen‐Streichert, Mario Thevis, Martin Juebner
2 citations
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
1.59
article

Assessment and cross-validation of calibration transferability between dried blood spot sampling devices for accurate quantification of phosphatidylethanol

J. Hose, Hilke Andresen‐Streichert, Mario Thevis, Martin Juebner
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a direct alcohol biomarker which is used in a variety of clinical and forensic contexts. Due to its limited stability in whole blood, PEth is routinely analysed using dried blood spots (DBS). There are many different commercially available sampling systems for DBS, but data on their comparability is scarce. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of PEth 16:0/18:1 and PEth 16:0/18:2 for three different DBS sampling systems: Whatman™ filter paper (903 Protein Saver Cards), Mitra<sup>®</sup> and Capitainer<sup>®</sup>B Vanadate. The transferability of calibration curves and their applicability across these devices should be assessed. The results showed that DBS of all devices could be prepared and analysed using the same procedure. Validation was successful for the devices. The accuracy of QCs was best if quantified using the matching DBS sampling device calibration curve (bias < 15 %). Higher, but still acceptable, bias values were observed when using a Whatman™ calibration curve to quantify PEth in DBS of the Capitainer<sup>®</sup>B Vanadate system and vice versa. Mitra<sup>®</sup> QCs should only be quantified using device-specific calibration curves, as in all other cases, accuracy exceeded the limit of 15 %. We recommend analysing samples using device-specific calibrations at all times, as determined PEth concentrations might be crucial for patients and should not be subjected to any avoidable uncertainty.

Analytical and Bioanalytical ChemistryVol. 417(17)
German Sport University Cologne (DE), University of Cologne (DE), University Hospital Cologne (DE)
Universitätsklinikum Köln
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
1.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.